Literature DB >> 16985501

Novel deletion variants of 9q13-q21.12 and classical euchromatic variants of 9q12/qh involve deletion, duplication and triplication of large tracts of segmentally duplicated pericentromeric euchromatin.

Lionel R Willatt1, John C K Barber, Amanda Clarkson, Ingrid Simonic, F Lucy Raymond, Zoe Docherty, Caroline Mackie Ogilvie.   

Abstract

Large-scale copy number variation that is cytogenetically visible in normal individuals has been described as euchromatic variation but needs to be distinguished from pathogenic euchromatic deletion or duplication. Here, we report eight patients (three families and two individuals) with interstitial deletions of 9q13-q21.12. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with a large panel of BACs showed that all the deleted clones were from extensive tracts of segmentally duplicated euchromatin, copies of which map to both the long and short arms of chromosome 9. The variety of reasons for which these patients were ascertained, and the phenotypically normal parents, indicates that this is a novel euchromatic variant with no phenotypic effect. Further, four patients with classical euchromatic variants of 9q12/qh or 9p12 were also shown to have duplications or triplications of this segmentally duplicated material common to both 9p and 9q. The cytogenetic boundaries between the segmentally duplicated regions and flanking unique sequences were mapped to 9p13.1 in the short arm (BAC RP11-402N8 at 38.7 Mb) and to 9q21.12 in the long arm (BAC RP11-88I18 at 70.3 Mb). The BACs identified in this study should in future make it possible to differentiate between clinically significant deletions or duplications and euchromatic variants with no established phenotypic consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985501     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  5 in total

1.  The variant inv(2)(p11.2q13) is a genuinely recurrent rearrangement but displays some breakpoint heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ina Fickelscher; Thomas Liehr; Kathryn Watts; Victoria Bryant; John C K Barber; Simone Heidemann; Reiner Siebert; Jens Michael Hertz; Zeynep Tumer; N Simon Thomas
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Heteromorphic variants of chromosome 9.

Authors:  Nadezda Kosyakova; Ani Grigorian; Thomas Liehr; Marina Manvelyan; Isabella Simonyan; Hasmik Mkrtchyan; Rouben Aroutiounian; Anna D Polityko; Anna I Kulpanovich; Tatiana Egorova; Evgenia Jaroshevich; Alla Frolova; Natalia Shorokh; Irina V Naumchik; Marianne Volleth; Isolde Schreyer; Heike Nelle; Markus Stumm; Rolf-Dieter Wegner; Gisela Reising-Ackermann; Martina Merkas; Lukretija Brecevic; Thomas Martin; Laura Rodríguez; Samarth Bhatt; Monika Ziegler; Katharina Kreskowski; Anja Weise; Ali Sazci; Svetlana Vorsanova; Marcelo de Bello Cioffi; Emel Ergul
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Duplication 9p and their implication to phenotype.

Authors:  Roberta Santos Guilherme; Vera Ayres Meloni; Ana Beatriz Alvarez Perez; Ana Luiza Pilla; Marco Antonio Paula de Ramos; Anelisa Gollo Dantas; Sylvia Satomi Takeno; Leslie Domenici Kulikowski; Maria Isabel Melaragno
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.103

4.  Expansion of a 12-kb VNTR containing the REXO1L1 gene cluster underlies the microscopically visible euchromatic variant of 8q21.2.

Authors:  Christine Tyson; Andrew J Sharp; Monica Hrynchak; Siu L Yong; Edward J Hollox; Peter Warburton; John Ck Barber
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as the first-tier test for the identification of pathogenic copy number variants in chromosome 9 pericentric regions and its challenge.

Authors:  Jia-Chi Wang; Fatih Z Boyar
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.009

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.