Literature DB >> 16985443

Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome.

Neel Anand1, John F Hamilton, Brian Perri, Hamid Miraliakbar, Theodore Goldstein.   

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Prospective cohort study in a tertiary care spine center.
OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of the cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (C-TLIF) technique in creating and maintaining lordosis, avoiding nerve problems, and obtaining fusion was studied. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: C-TLIF is a microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique, emphasizing no dural retraction with placement of structural allograft and RhBMP2 anteriorly under the cortical apophyseal ring, followed by middle column cancellous autograft placed under compression with posterior pedicle spinal instrumentation.
METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients studied with an average of 30 months of follow-up. A total of 48 had prior surgery at the index level; 16 had the procedure done at an adjacent level to a previous fusion; 32 at L5-S1 with 42 at L4-L5 and 26 at L3-L4. There were 76 single-level and 24 two-level fusions. One patient was a smoker with one other patient a compensation case. Outcome was prospectively documented with self-administered Visual Analog Pain Scale, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Treatment Intensity Questionnaire, and SF-36 Health Survey. Patients rated the surgery as excellent, good, fair, or poor and whether they would recommend the surgery. Student t test was used for statistical analysis with significance set at P = 0.05.
RESULTS: Blood loss and hospital stay averaged 300 mL and 2.2 days, respectively. There was significant reduction (P < 0.05) in pain scores from 9 to 3, Oswestry Disability Index scores from 35 to 12, and Treatment Intensity Score from 21/25 to 2/25 at final follow-up. The SF-36 PCS and MCS scores showed an increasing trend to improvement. A total of 69 rated the surgery as excellent, 23 good, 7 fair, and 1 poor. A total of 97% were satisfied and would recommend the surgery. All had improvement in radicular pain with no dural tears, neural injury, or neuropathic pain. There was significant improvement (P < 0.05) in segmental sagittal lordosis from 2 degrees to 9 degrees, anterior disc height from 6 to 14 mm, and posterior disc height from 4 to 8 mm. There was no subsidence, misplaced screws, or instrumentation failure. Solid fusion was obtained in 99 of 100 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The C-TLIF allows for creation and maintenance of sagittal lordosis while avoiding subsidence and neurologic problems with a 99% fusion rate and 97% patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985443     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240211.23617.ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Disposable instrumentation for lumbar pedicle screw and rod constructs.

Authors:  Antonio Faundez; Wendy Thompson; J-C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A morphometric analysis of contralateral neural foramen in TLIF.

Authors:  Pyung Goo Cho; Sang Hyuk Park; Keung Nyun Kim; Yoon Ha; Do Heum Yoon; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Alice Darnis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

4.  Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion stratified by preoperative diagnosis.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Shen; Madeline Lagina; Anthony Hutchison
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Single-use instrumentation in posterior lumbar fusion could decrease incidence of surgical site infection: a prospective bi-centric study.

Authors:  Stéphane Litrico; Geoffrey Recanati; Antoine Gennari; Cédric Maillot; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-01

6.  Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  J Rodríguez-Vela; A Lobo-Escolar; E Joven-Aliaga; A Herrera; J Vicente; E Suñén; A Loste; A Tabuenca
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Minimally invasive surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompression, anterior/lateral and posterior lumbar approaches.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ya Ruth Huo; Jarred A Hogan; Joshua Xu; Alexander Dunn; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs; Patrick McKenna; Trichy Rajagopal; Farhaan Altaf
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

8.  Experimental and clinical analysis of a posterolateral lumbar appendicular bone graft fusion.

Authors:  Jian-Wen Wang; Dong-Min Xiao; Hong Wu; Ming Ye; Xiong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

9.  The Influence of Lordotic cages on creating Sagittal Balance in the CMIS treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Ryan B Cohen; Jason Cohen; Babak Kahndehroo; Sheila Kahwaty; Eli Baron
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-30

10.  Predictive Factors and Rates of Fusion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Utilizing rhBMP-2 or Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Samuel C Overley; Steven J McAnany; Muhammad A Anwar; Robert K Merrill; Andrew Lovy; Javier Z Guzman; Sergey Zhadanov; Amish Doshi; Edward Rothenberg; Avani Vaishnav; Catherine Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.