Literature DB >> 16985205

Wing beat kinematics of a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, flying at different flight speeds and Strouhal numbers.

Ulla M Lindhe Norberg1, York Winter.   

Abstract

High-speed film analysis showed that the wing beat kinematics in Glossophaga soricina change gradually with increasing flight speed, indicating that there is no sudden gait change at any particular, critical, flight speed. The flight of two adult specimens was studied over a range of flight speeds (1.23-7.52 ms(-1)) in a 30 m long flight tunnel. During the upstroke in hovering and slow flight there is a tip-reversal or supination of the handwings, which thus produce a backward flick. This backward motion successively disappears at speeds V approximately 3.2 ms(-1), above which the wingtip path becomes more vertical or directed upwards-forwards relative to the still air (the stroke plane angle increasing with flight speed as alpha=44.8V(0.29)). We found no correlations between either span ratio SR (the ratio of the wing span on the upstroke to that on the downstroke) and V, or downstroke ratio (the duration of the downstroke divided by the total stroke period) and V. On the other hand, SR decreases significantly with increasing wing beat frequency f, SR proportional to f(-0.40). The Strouhal number (St=f x amplitude/V), a dimensionless parameter describing oscillating flow mechanisms and being a predictor of the unsteadiness of the flow, decreases with the speed as St proportional to V(-1.37). Close to the theoretical minimum power speed (4-6 m s(-1)) G. soricina operates with a Strouhal number in the region 0.17<St<0.22, which is associated with efficient lift and thrust production. At slower speeds, 3.4-4 m s(-1), St is 0.25-0.4, which is still within the favourable region. But at speeds below 3 m s(-1) St becomes higher (0.5<St<0.68), indicating that unsteady effects become important, with unfavourable lift and thrust production as a result. Only at these speeds do the bats perform the backward flick during the upstroke, which may produce thrust. This may serve as a compensation in some bats and birds to increase aerodynamic performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985205     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Comparative aerodynamic performance of flapping flight in two bat species using time-resolved wake visualization.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; L Christoffer Johansson; York Winter; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Upstroke wing flexion and the inertial cost of bat flight.

Authors:  Daniel K Riskin; Attila Bergou; Kenneth S Breuer; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Changes in kinematics and aerodynamics over a range of speeds in Tadarida brasiliensis, the Brazilian free-tailed bat.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; Nickolay I Hristov; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Flapping tail membrane in bats produces potentially important thrust during horizontal takeoffs and very slow flight.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Emily R Snode; Jason B Shaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparing aerodynamic efficiency in birds and bats suggests better flight performance in birds.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; L Christoffer Johansson; Melissa S Bowlin; York Winter; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hindlimb motion during steady flight of the lesser dog-faced fruit bat, Cynopterus brachyotis.

Authors:  Jorn A Cheney; Daniel Ton; Nicolai Konow; Daniel K Riskin; Kenneth S Breuer; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Sugar Metabolism in Hummingbirds and Nectar Bats.

Authors:  Raul K Suarez; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Kinematics and wing shape across flight speed in the bat, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae.

Authors:  Rhea Von Busse; Anders Hedenström; York Winter; L Christoffer Johansson
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.422

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.