Literature DB >> 16985149

Accessory left gastric artery from left hepatic artery shown on MDCT and conventional angiography: correlation with CT hepatic arteriography.

Kousei Ishigami1, Kengo Yoshimitsu, Hiroyuki Irie, Tsuyoshi Tajima, Yoshiki Asayama, Masakazu Hirakawa, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT and conventional angiography in the detection of an accessory left gastric artery using CT hepatic arteriography as the standard of reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 118 patients who underwent MDCT with a triple-phase liver protocol with a slice thickness of 5 mm, conventional angiography, and CT hepatic arteriography. The early-phase images of MDCT and conventional angiography were retrospectively reviewed. The presence or absence of an accessory left gastric artery was evaluated using CT hepatic arteriography as the standard of reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MDCT and conventional angiography were calculated.
RESULTS: CT hepatic arteriography revealed an accessory left gastric artery in 25 (21.2%) of 118 cases, including 15 proximal- and 10 distal-type accessory left gastric arteries. On MDCT, there were seven false-negative cases and one false-positive case. Six of the seven false-negative cases were a proximal-type accessory left gastric artery, and nine of 10 distal-type accessory left gastric arteries were correctly diagnosed using MDCT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MDCT were 72.0%, 98.9%, and 93.2%, respectively. On conventional angiography, there were three false-negative and two false-positive cases, none of whom underwent selective left hepatic arteriography. Two of the three false-negative cases were the distal-type accessory left gastric artery, but eight of the 10 distal-type accessory left gastric arteries were correctly diagnosed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional angiography were 88.0%, 97.8%, and 95.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Approximately 70% of accessory left gastric arteries can be diagnosed at the early phase of MDCT even with a slice thickness of 5 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985149     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Anatomic variations of the hepatic arteries in 250 patients studied with 64-row CT angiography.

Authors:  Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Riccardo Ferrari; Marco Rengo; Pasquale Paolantonio; Fabrizio Vecchietti; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Vascular anatomy of the stomach related to resection procedures strategy.

Authors:  V Prudius; V Procházka; Z Pavlovský; D Prudius; Z Kala
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Safety analysis of holmium-166 microsphere scout dose imaging during radioembolisation work-up: A cohort study.

Authors:  Arthur J A T Braat; Jip F Prince; Rob van Rooij; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Marnix G E H Lam
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Accessory left gastric artery aneurysms in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Toshihide Tomosugi; Takuji Takahashi; Yoshihisa Kawase; Koichi Yoshida; Shogo Hayashi; Takefumi Sugiyama; Mitsuya Shimizu; Michita Shoka; Kohichi Sawaki; Eiji Onishi; Naomi Hayashi; Hidenobu Matsushita; Osamu Okochi
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.131

5.  A Case of Unusual Vascularization of Upper Abdominal Cavity' Organs.

Authors:  Natalia Mazuruc; Serghei Covantev; Olga Belic
Journal:  Case Rep Vasc Med       Date:  2018-10-31

6.  The "Vessel through Strait" Sign is a Signature Radiological Sign for the Diagnosis of Left Hepatic Artery Variation.

Authors:  Guanghua Rong; Zhijun Wang; Ximing Wang; Qiang Yu; Lin Zhou; Huaming Wang; Junhua Zhang; Jinghui Dong; Wei Ma; Weimin An; Hui Ren; Zhen Zeng; Yinying Lu; Yongwu Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.