Literature DB >> 16985133

MR angiography of the hand with subsystolic cuff-compression optimization of injection parameters.

Thomas M Gluecker1, Georg Bongartz, Hans Peter Ledermann, Deniz Bilecen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of various injection rates on contrast-enhanced high-resolution 3D MR angiography of the hand.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy individuals (mean age, 24.4 years; range, 20-27 years) underwent 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of both hands. Starting 3 minutes before data acquisition, subsystolic upper arm cuff compression was applied unilaterally. A 1.5-T whole-body scanner with 3D gradient-echo sequence was used. Seven data sets (20 seconds) were obtained consecutively. I.v. contrast material of 0.1 mg/kg of body weight of gadobutrol was injected at rates of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mL/s. For both hands, quantitative data evaluation was performed with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the radial, ulnar, palmar, and digital arteries and veins. Qualitative assessment of the arterial visualization score and venous contamination score was rated by two experienced radiologists using a 4-point scale.
RESULTS: The lowest venous contamination score (CNR and reviewers' assessment) was observed with an injection rate of 0.5 mL/s (p < 0.05). For the arterial signal, the reviewers' assessment was that an injection rate of 0.5 mL/s was best (p = 0.08). Compression yielded a significantly lower venous contamination score for the compressed side than for the noncompressed side for flow rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1.0 mL/s (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Image quality of hand MR angiography was better with cuff compression. A flow rate of 0.5 mL/s yielded a good CNR and a significantly lower venous contamination score than the other flow rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985133     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional electrocardiographically gated variable flip angle FSE imaging for MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T: initial experience.

Authors:  Ruth P Lim; Pippa Storey; Iliyana P Atanasova; Jian Xu; Elizabeth M Hecht; James S Babb; David R Stoffel; Hugo Chang; Kellyanne McGorty; Qun Chen; Henry Rusinek; H Michael Belmont; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography of the arteries of the hand. A comparison between an extracellular and an intravascular contrast agent.

Authors:  Clemens Reisinger; Thomas Gluecker; Augustinus Ludwig Jacob; Georg Bongartz; Deniz Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Assessment of vascular disorders of the upper extremity with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: pictorial review.

Authors:  Ahmed A K A Razek; Ehab Saad; Nermin Soliman; Heba A Elatta
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography of the hand: improved arterial conspicuity by multidirectional flow-sensitive dephasing magnetization preparation in 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Fan; Philip A Hodnett; Amir H Davarpanah; Timothy G Scanlon; John J Sheehan; John Varga; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  High temporal and spatial resolution 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the hands and feet.

Authors:  Clifton R Haider; Stephen J Riederer; Eric A Borisch; James F Glockner; Roger C Grimm; Thomas C Hulshizer; Thanila A Macedo; Petrice M Mostardi; Phillip J Rossman; Terri J Vrtiska; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Nonenhanced MR angiography of the hand with flow-sensitive dephasing-prepared balanced SSFP sequence: initial experience with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  John J Sheehan; Zhaoyang Fan; Amir H Davarpanah; Philip A Hodnett; John Varga; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Total-body contrast-enhanced MRA on a short, wide-bore 1.5-T system: intra-individual comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA.

Authors:  M Rasmus; J Bremerich; T Egelhof; R W Huegli; G Bongartz; D Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prediction of coronary artery disease by a systemic atherosclerosis score index derived from whole-body MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephanie Lehrke; Benjamin Egenlauf; Henning Steen; Dirk Lossnitzer; Grigorius Korosoglou; Constanze Merten; Boris T Ivandic; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.364

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.