Literature DB >> 16984845

Is digital intubation an option for emergency physicians in definitive airway management?

Scott E Young1, Michael A Miller, Chad S Crystal, Carl Skinner, Troy P Coon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether digital intubation is a valid option for definitive airway control by emergency physicians.
METHODS: Digital intubation was performed by 18 emergency medicine residents and 4 staff emergency medicine physicians on 6 different cadavers. Placement was confirmed by direct laryngoscopy. The total time for all attempts used, as well as the number of attempts, was recorded. Each participant attempted intubation on all 6 cadavers.
RESULTS: For 5 of the 6 cadavers, successful intubation occurred 90.9% of the time (confidence interval [CI], 85.5%-96.3%) for all participants. The average number of attempts for these 5 cadavers was 1.5 (CI, 1.4-1.7), and the average time required for success or failure was 20.8 seconds (CI, 16.9-24.8). The sixth cadaver developed soft tissue damage and a false passage near the vocal cords resulting in multiple failed attempts.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the gold standard for routine endotracheal intubation remains to be direct laryngoscopy, its effectiveness in certain situations may be limited. We believe that digital intubation provides emergency physicians with another option in securing the unprotected airway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16984845     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  1 in total

1.  Ujuzi (Practical Pearl/Perle Pratique).

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.