BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux occurs mainly during the daytime in patients with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis, but predominantly during the night in patients with grade C and D esophagitis. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate whether this difference in the pattern of gastroesophageal reflux influences the circumferential localization of erosions in the esophageal wall. METHODS: The subjects were 394 consecutive patients diagnosed endoscopically as having reflux esophagitis (grade A, n = 223; B, n = 93; C, n = 53; D, n = 25 cases). Their endoscopic films were reviewed retrospectively to determine the circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks, and also the prevalence and size of hiatal hernia (HH). RESULTS: The numbers of mucosal breaks analyzed in patients with grade A, B and C esophagitis were 321, 173 and 54, respectively. Patients with grade A and B esophagitis had longitudinal mucosal breaks mainly in the right-anterior wall of the lower esophagus, whereas patients with grade C esophagitis had transverse mucosal breaks mainly in the posterior wall. The prevalence and size of HH was significantly higher and larger, respectively, in patients with grade C or D esophagitis than in those with grade A and B esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks differs significantly among different grades of esophagitis.
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux occurs mainly during the daytime in patients with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis, but predominantly during the night in patients with grade C and D esophagitis. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate whether this difference in the pattern of gastroesophageal reflux influences the circumferential localization of erosions in the esophageal wall. METHODS: The subjects were 394 consecutive patients diagnosed endoscopically as having reflux esophagitis (grade A, n = 223; B, n = 93; C, n = 53; D, n = 25 cases). Their endoscopic films were reviewed retrospectively to determine the circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks, and also the prevalence and size of hiatal hernia (HH). RESULTS: The numbers of mucosal breaks analyzed in patients with grade A, B and C esophagitis were 321, 173 and 54, respectively. Patients with grade A and B esophagitis had longitudinal mucosal breaks mainly in the right-anterior wall of the lower esophagus, whereas patients with grade C esophagitis had transverse mucosal breaks mainly in the posterior wall. The prevalence and size of HH was significantly higher and larger, respectively, in patients with grade C or D esophagitis than in those with grade A and B esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks differs significantly among different grades of esophagitis.