Literature DB >> 16983518

Optimization of endometrial preparation results in a normal endometrial function test (EFT) and good reproductive outcome in donor ovum recipients.

H J Kliman1, S Honig, D Walls, M Luna, J C McSweet, Alan B Copperman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have investigated potential markers of endometrial receptivity as predictors of successful implantation. Cyclin E and p27 have recently been studied using the endometrial function test (EFT). Our objective is to determine the correlation between the expression of cyclin E and p27 and the adequacy of uterine preparation of recipients using donor oocytes.
METHODS: Twenty recipients undergoing preparatory cycles with leuprolide acetate, estrogen, and progesterone. Endometrial biopsies were obtained 10-12 days after progesterone supplementation following the course of estrogen. The tissue was prepared for histological analysis and immunohistochemical staining for cyclin E assessment. The outcome of their subsequent ovum donation cycle was blinded to the reviewer of the EFT.
RESULTS: All recipients showed normal luteal transformation. Nineteen (95%) of the recipients had a normal EFT. This is significantly higher than what we demonstrated, previously, in unexplained infertility patients, where only 40% of such patients had a normal EFT. Thirteen recipients with a normal EFT had a clinical pregnancy, while 6 did not become pregnant in their subsequent transfer cycles. The sole patient with an abnormal EFT did not conceive on 2 subsequent cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: While a normal EFT does not guarantee a successful pregnancy, an abnormal EFT appears to be associated with pregnancy failure. This may be useful in identifying women who need adjustments to their stimulation protocols prior to progressing to a physically, emotionally, and financially costly cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16983518     DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9061-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  22 in total

Review 1.  Pinopode expression during human implantation.

Authors:  L G Nardo; L Sabatini; R Rai; F Nardo
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2002-03-10       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 2.  Preparation of the human endometrium for implantation.

Authors:  D Navot; P Bergh
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Error in histologic dating of secretory endometrium: variance component analysis.

Authors:  M Gibson; G J Badger; F Byrn; K R Lee; R Korson; T D Trainer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: a noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy.

Authors:  L Grunfeld; B Walker; P A Bergh; B Sandler; G Hofmann; D Navot
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Interleukin-1 system crosstalk between embryo and endometrium in implantation.

Authors:  C Simón; A Pellicer; M L Polan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  The role of HOX genes in human implantation.

Authors:  Hye Eun Kwon; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Endometrial glycodelin-A expression in the luteal phase of stimulated ovarian cycles.

Authors:  S E Brown; E Mandelin; S Oehninger; J P Toner; M Seppala; H W Jones
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Improved endometrial assessment using cyclin E and p27.

Authors:  Rebecca L Dubowy; Ronald F Feinberg; David L Keefe; Gustavo F Doncel; Shaun C Williams; Juliette C McSweet; Harvey J Kliman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Localization of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-2 to the surface of invasive cells by interaction with integrin alpha v beta 3.

Authors:  P C Brooks; S Strömblad; L C Sanders; T L von Schalscha; R T Aimes; W G Stetler-Stevenson; J P Quigley; D A Cheresh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The effects of progesterone and progestins on endometrial proliferation.

Authors:  D L Moyer; J C Felix
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  5 in total

1.  Proteomic analysis of menstrual blood.

Authors:  Heyi Yang; Bo Zhou; Mechthild Prinz; Donald Siegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  Local and systemic factors and implantation: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Chelsea Fox; Scott Morin; Jae-Wook Jeong; Richard T Scott; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Endometrial receptivity defects during IVF cycles with and without letrozole.

Authors:  Paul B Miller; Brent A Parnell; Greta Bushnell; Nicholas Tallman; David A Forstein; H Lee Higdon; Jo Kitawaki; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  EndoTime: non-categorical timing estimates for luteal endometrium.

Authors:  Julia Lipecki; Andrew E Mitchell; Joanne Muter; Emma S Lucas; Komal Makwana; Katherine Fishwick; Joshua Odendaal; Amelia Hawkes; Pavle Vrljicak; Jan J Brosens; Sascha Ott
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Insight on Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Endometrial Receptivity.

Authors:  Min Chen; Zimeng Zheng; Jialu Shi; Jun Shao
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.