Literature DB >> 16982458

Phase I trial of PT-100 (PT-100), a cytokine-inducing small molecule, following chemotherapy for solid tumor malignancy.

John Nemunaitis1, Svetislava J Vukelja, Donald Richards, Casey Cunningham, Neil Senzer, John Nugent, Houston Duncan, Barry Jones, Eric Haltom, Margaret J Uprichard.   

Abstract

PT-100 upregulates cytokine expression competitively inhibiting the dipeptidyl peptidase activity of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV). This dose-escalation study was conducted to evaluate the safety of PT-100 in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and to assess its effects on neutrophil recovery.PT-100 was administered orally for 7 days as a 200 microg, 400 microg, 800 microg, or 1,200 microg total daily dose (divided twice daily) to 6, 6, 17, and 5 patients, respectively. Patients received 2 cycles of chemotherapy: The first cycle served as each individual patient's control. Patients had to develop Grade 3+ neutropenia in Cycle 1 in order to receive PT-100 in Cycle 2. Most patients received PT-100 on Days 2-8 of chemotherapy in Cycle 2, except at 800 microg where an additional cohort (n = 8) was treated on a Days 5-11 schedule. Five of 7 patients receiving 800 microg on Days 2-8 experienced a >/=1-day improvement in Grade 3+ neutropenia in Cycle 2 versus Cycle 1. Overall, PT-100 was well tolerated. A reduction in chemotherapy-related nausea, vomiting, fatigue, alopecia, and diarrhea was noted in patients receiving PT-100. Edema/peripheral swelling, hypotension, hypovolemia, and dizziness were the most common nonhematologic adverse events considered related to PT-100. Two Grade 3 adverse events were considered related to PT-100: syncope (1,200 microg) and orthostatic hypotension (800 microg). A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Given the accelerated neutrophil recovery, preclinical evidence of antitumor activity, and tolerable toxicities of PT-100, additional studies to optimize the PT-100 dosing schedule in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982458     DOI: 10.1080/07357900600894732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  12 in total

1.  Pediatric phase I trial design using maximum target inhibition as the primary endpoint.

Authors:  Holly Meany; Frank M Balis; Alberta Aikin; Patricia Whitcomb; Robert F Murphy; Seth M Steinberg; Brigitte C Widemann; Elizabeth Fox
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Fibroblast Activation Protein-α Expressing Fibroblasts Promote Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Feng Li; Xia Wu; Zhixiang Sun; Peng Cai; Ligao Wu; Duojie Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Selective fluorescence probes for dipeptidyl peptidase activity-fibroblast activation protein and dipeptidyl peptidase IV.

Authors:  Koon Siew Lai; Nan-Hui Ho; Jonathan D Cheng; Ching-Hsuan Tung
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.774

4.  Inhibitor of DASH proteases affects expression of adhesion molecules in osteoclasts and reduces myeloma growth and bone disease.

Authors:  Angela Pennisi; Xin Li; Wen Ling; Sharmin Khan; Dana Gaddy; Larry J Suva; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy; Nazneen Aziz; Shmuel Yaccoby
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  Unravelling the immunological roles of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) activity and/or structure homologue (DASH) proteins.

Authors:  L Wagner; C Klemann; M Stephan; S von Hörsten
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Suppression of tumor growth in mice by rationally designed pseudopeptide inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein and prolyl oligopeptidase.

Authors:  Kenneth W Jackson; Victoria J Christiansen; Vivek R Yadav; Robert Silasi-Mansat; Florea Lupu; Vibhudutta Awasthi; Roy R Zhang; Patrick A McKee
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  DPP8/DPP9 inhibition elicits canonical Nlrp1b inflammasome hallmarks in murine macrophages.

Authors:  Nathalia M de Vasconcelos; Gwendolyn Vliegen; Amanda Gonçalves; Emilie De Hert; Rosa Martín-Pérez; Nina Van Opdenbosch; Anvesh Jallapally; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Anne-Marie Lambeir; Koen Augustyns; Pieter Van Der Veken; Ingrid De Meester; Mohamed Lamkanfi
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Phase II assessment of talabostat and cisplatin in second-line stage IV melanoma.

Authors:  Robert M Eager; C Casey Cunningham; Neil N Senzer; Joe Stephenson; Stephen P Anthony; Steven J O'Day; Gary Frenette; Anna C Pavlick; Barry Jones; Margaret Uprichard; John Nemunaitis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Val-boroPro accelerates T cell priming via modulation of dendritic cell trafficking resulting in complete regression of established murine tumors.

Authors:  Meghaan P Walsh; Brynn Duncan; Shannon Larabee; Aviva Krauss; Jessica P E Davis; Yongzhi Cui; Su Young Kim; Martin Guimond; William Bachovchin; Terry J Fry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of action of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.

Authors:  Erin E Mulvihill; Daniel J Drucker
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.