Literature DB >> 16982385

Physical activity for bone health in inactive teenage girls: is a supervised, teacher-led program or self-led program best?

Niamh M Murphy1, Melanie Ni Dhuinn, Philip A Browne, Maoilíosa M Orathaille.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a six-month teacher-led osteogenic physical activity program, vs. a self-led activity program, on ultrasound measurements of bone in inactive teenage girls.
METHODS: Ninety sedentary girls [mean (SD) age 16.3 (.6) years] were identified from 300 assessed for physical activity across five schools in southeast Ireland. Schools were matched and randomly assigned to a teacher-led physical activity (TLPA) program, a self-led physical activity (SLPA) program, or a control group. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and os calcis stiffness index (OCSI) were measured using a portable ultrasound machine. Anthropometry, aerobic fitness, calcium intake, and physical activity were assessed, and focus groups held one month after program completion. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Both intervention groups demonstrated significant improvements (p < .05) in BUA, SOS, OCSI and aerobic fitness, i.e., TLPA: +14.9%, +21.9%, + 15.9%, and +8.5%, respectively, and SLPA: +10.6%, +30.3%, + 15.6%, and +5.1%, respectively, with no change in controls. Differences between intervention groups and controls were significant for BUA and OCSI (p < .05). TLPA and SLPA groups engaged in an average of 4.5 and 3.4 hours/week of physical activity, respectively, over the intervention period. The SLPA group continued to exercise after the intervention had ceased, whereas the TLPA group did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Previously inactive teenage girls can adhere to an osteogenic activity program whether supervised or directing their own activity. Longer-term, sustainable initiatives with this age group are needed and might focus on developing personal skills for physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982385     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  5 in total

1.  Effects of lifestyle exercise on premenopausal bone health: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Opeyemi Babatunde; Jacky Forsyth
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Interventions for promoting physical activity among European teenagers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Femke De Meester; Frank J van Lenthe; Heleen Spittaels; Nanna Lien; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Adding effect sizes to a systematic review on interventions for promoting physical activity among European teenagers.

Authors:  Rik Crutzen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Teenage recommendations to improve physical activity for their age group: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Michaela James; Charlotte Todd; Samantha Scott; Gareth Stratton; Sarah McCoubrey; Danielle Christian; Julian Halcox; Suzanne Audrey; Elizabeth Ellins; Samantha Anderson; Isabel Copp; Sinead Brophy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Predictors of cardiovascular health in teenagers (aged 13-14 years): a cross-sectional study linked with routine data.

Authors:  Michaela James; Danielle Christian; Samantha Scott; Charlotte Todd; Gareth Stratton; Joanne Demmler; Sarah McCoubrey; Julian P Halcox; Suzanne Audrey; Elizabeth Anne Ellins; Sinead Brophy
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-10-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.