Literature DB >> 16981845

Relationships between genetic polymorphisms and anticancer drug cytotoxicity vis-à-vis the NCI-60 panel.

Valérie Le Morvan1, Ricardo Bellott, François Moisan, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Jacques Bonnet, Jacques Robert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-60 panel consists of 60 human tumor cell lines initially established for screening thousands of molecules for antiproliferative activity. It has been powerful for deciphering the relationships between anticancer drug cytotoxicity and cell molecular characteristics. We tested its potential interest for establishing relationships between the polymorphism of genes involved in drug metabolism and transport or in DNA repair, and drug cytotoxicity extracted from NCI databases.
METHODS: Using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) techniques, three frequent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed: Lys751Gln in the Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D (XPD, ERCC2) gene, Asp1104His in the Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XPG, ERCC5) gene and Ile105Val in the glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene.
RESULTS: The allelic frequencies of the variants were 33% for ERCC2, 23% for ERCC5 and 39% for GSTP1. The ERCC2 polymorphism appeared to be a strong determinant of the in vitro cytotoxicity of most anticancer agents, with lower half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values in variant homozygous lines than in common homozygous or heterozygous cell lines. Unexpectedly, the cytotoxicity of taxanes appeared markedly dependent upon the ERCC2 genotype, with threefold lower mean IC50 values in variant homozygous cell lines. The ERCC5 genotype appeared to be important only for taxanes, with fourfold higher IC50 values in variant homozygous cell lines. The GSTP1 polymorphism was related to the cytotoxicity of several drug classes, especially topoisomerase inhibitors, antimetabolites and N7 alkylating agents.
CONCLUSION: The NCI-60 panel is capable of providing clues and tracks for the establishment of clinically useful relationships between a given genotype and the cytotoxicity of an anticancer agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16981845     DOI: 10.2217/14622416.7.6.843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  11 in total

1.  Nucleotide excision repair polymorphisms and survival outcome for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary A Bewick; Robert M Lafrenie; Michael S C Conlon
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  The use of genomic information to optimize cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Federico Innocenti; Nancy J Cox; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomic discovery using cell-based models.

Authors:  Marleen Welsh; Lara Mangravite; Marisa Wong Medina; Kelan Tantisira; Wei Zhang; R Stephanie Huang; Howard McLeod; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Identification of SNPs associated with response of breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the EORTC-10994 randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  V Le Morvan; S Litière; A Laroche-Clary; S Ait-Ouferoukh; R Bellott; C Messina; D Cameron; H Bonnefoi; J Robert
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Reduced expression of DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XPD, and OGG1) in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck in North India.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Mohan Chand Pant; Hirdya Shanker Singh; Shashi Khandelwal
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-11-15

6.  XPD DNA nucleotide excision repair gene polymorphisms associated with DNA repair deficiency predict better treatment outcomes in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Nataliya Kuptsova-Clarkson; Christine B Ambrosone; Joli Weiss; Maria R Baer; Lara E Sucheston; Gary Zirpoli; Kenneth J Kopecky; Laurie Ford; Javier Blanco; Meir Wetzler; Kirsten B Moysich
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2010-08-10

7.  Cisplatin pharmacogenetics, DNA repair polymorphisms, and esophageal cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Penelope A Bradbury; Matthew H Kulke; Rebecca S Heist; Wei Zhou; Clement Ma; Wei Xu; Ariela L Marshall; Rihong Zhai; Susanne M Hooshmand; Kofi Asomaning; Li Su; Frances A Shepherd; Thomas J Lynch; John C Wain; David C Christiani; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Cancer pharmacogenomics: role of DNA repair genetic polymorphisms in individualizing cancer therapy.

Authors:  Lucy Gossage; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  Impact of EGFR gene polymorphisms on anticancer drug cytotoxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Stéphane Puyo; Valérie Le Morvan; Jacques Robert
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  The association between the T309G polymorphism of the MDM2 gene and sensitivity to anticancer drug is dependent on the p53 mutational status in cellular models.

Authors:  N Faur; L Araud; A Laroche-Clary; J Kanno; J Toutain; T Yamori; J Robert; V Le Morvan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.