Literature DB >> 16981799

Assessing potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly Veterans Affairs population using the HEDIS 2006 quality measure.

Mary Jo V Pugh1, Joseph T Hanlon, John E Zeber, Arlene Bierman, John Cornell, Dan R Berlowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have found that 20% to 25% of older patients receive drugs identified as inappropriate by the 1997 Beers criteria. After the addition of 22 new drugs to the 2003 Beers criteria, the National Committee on Quality Assurance convened an expert consensus panel to identify which drugs from the 2003 Beers criteria should always be avoided in the elderly. The resulting list of drugs to avoid was added to the 2006 Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) to measure the quality of prescribing for the elderly.
OBJECTIVE: To use HEDIS 2006 criteria to determine the rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly (PIPE) and to determine if patient risk factors are similar to those found using Beers criteria.
METHODS: This cross-sectional database study identified older patients receiving drugs included in the HEDIS 2006 criteria using national data from the Veterans Health Administration. Patients aged 65 years or older on October 1, 1999, with at least 2 outpatient visit days during fiscal year 2000, ending September 30, or outpatient visits in fiscal years 1999 and 2000 were included (N=1,096,361). Multivariable logistic regression analyses stratified by gender identified patient characteristics associated with increased risk of HEDIS 2006 drug exposure. Since oral estrogens were considered appropriate at the time of this study, they were excluded from the list of HEDIS 2006 drugs.
RESULTS: Overall, 19.6% of older veterans were exposed to HEDIS 2006 drugs. 23.3% of older veteran women and 19.2% of older veteran men. The most commonly prescribed HEDIS 2006 drugs were antihistamines (received by 9.0% of men and 10.7% of women), opioid analgesics (received by 4.6% of men and 5.8% of women), and skeletal muscle relaxants (received by 4.3% of men and 5.3% of women). Propoxyphene was the most commonly used HEDIS 2006 drug, received by 4.5% of men and 5.7% of women, followed by diphenhydramine, received by 3.5% of men and 4.7% of women, and hydroxyzine, received by 3.2% of both men and women. Patients receiving 10 or more medications of any type were at greatest risk of exposure. Men were 8.2 times more likely to receive at least 1 HEDIS 2006 drug than those taking 1 to 3 drugs of any type (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-8.4), while women were 9.6 times more likely (95% CI, 8.2-11.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Even though we included a slightly different list of drugs to avoid, results for the HEDIS 2006 measure were similar to those of the 1997 Beers criteria. The HEDIS 2006 drugs are commonly prescribed, and there is a distinct need for direct evidence linking HEDIS 2006 PIPE exposure to adverse patient outcomes. To reduce PIPE, it seems necessary to provide additional evidence for clinicians through the conducting of a well-designed study to assess patient outcomes associated with PIPE exposure as defined by the HEDIS criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16981799     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.7.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  36 in total

1.  Potentially inappropriate medications and risk of hospitalization in retirees: analysis of a US retiree health claims database.

Authors:  Steven M Albert; Alberto Colombi; Joseph Hanlon
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Ronald J Maggiore; Cary P Gross; Arti Hurria
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-24

Review 3.  Comparison of published explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate medications in older adults.

Authors:  Chirn-Bin Chang; Ding-Cheng Chan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Exposure to potentially harmful drug-disease interactions in older community-dwelling veterans based on the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality measure: who is at risk?

Authors:  Mary Jo V Pugh; Catherine I Starner; Megan E Amuan; Dan R Berlowitz; Monica Horton; Zachary A Marcum; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Facility-level variation in potentially inappropriate prescribing for older veterans.

Authors:  Walid F Gellad; Chester B Good; Megan E Amuan; Zachary A Marcum; Joseph T Hanlon; Mary Jo V Pugh
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  The clinical implications of ageing for rational drug therapy.

Authors:  Shaojun Shi; Klaus Mörike; Ulrich Klotz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Trends in use of high-risk medications for older veterans: 2004 to 2006.

Authors:  Mary Jo V Pugh; Joseph T Hanlon; Chen-Pin Wang; Todd Semla; Muriel Burk; Megan E Amuan; Ashlei Lowery; Chester B Good; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy: application of six sets of published explicit criteria.

Authors:  Chirn-Bin Chang; Jen-Hau Chen; Chiung-Jung Wen; Hsu-Ko Kuo; I-Shu Lu; Lee-Shu Chiu; Shwu-Chong Wu; Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Anticancer drug therapy in the older cancer patient: pharmacology and polypharmacy.

Authors:  Stuart M Lichtman; Manpreet K Boparai
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2008-07-29

10.  What factors predict potentially inappropriate primary care prescribing in older people? Analysis of UK primary care patient record database.

Authors:  Iain M Carey; Stephen De Wilde; Tess Harris; Christina Victor; Nicky Richards; Sean R Hilton; Derek G Cook
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.