Literature DB >> 16981600

Presentation modality influences behavioral measures of alerting, orienting, and executive control.

Katherine L Roberts1, A Quentin Summerfield, Deborah A Hall.   

Abstract

The Attention Network Test (ANT) uses visual stimuli to separately assess the attentional skills of alerting (improved performance following a warning cue), spatial orienting (an additional benefit when the warning cue also cues target location), and executive control (impaired performance when a target stimulus contains conflicting information). This study contrasted performance on auditory and visual versions of the ANT to determine whether the measures it obtains are influenced by presentation modality. Forty healthy volunteers completed both auditory and visual tests. Reaction-time measures of executive control were of a similar magnitude and significantly correlated, suggesting that executive control might be a supramodal resource. Measures of alerting were also comparable across tasks. In contrast, spatial-orienting benefits were obtained only in the visual task. Auditory spatial cues did not improve response times to auditory targets presented at the cued location. The different spatial-orienting measures could reflect either separate orienting resources for each perceptual modality, or an interaction between a supramodal orienting resource and modality-specific perceptual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16981600     DOI: 10.1017/s1355617706060620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  19 in total

1.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Measuring attention in the hemispheres: the lateralized attention network test (LANT).

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Anat Barnea; Kristin Herzberg; Anat Rassis; Maital Neta; Amir Raz; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of prosody on the cognitive and neural resources supporting sentence comprehension: A behavioral and lesion-symptom mapping study.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; Nicole Blumenstein; McKayla Tully; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Assessment of alerting, orienting, and executive control in persons with aphasia using the Attention Network Test.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; McKayla Tully; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Auditory attention following a left hemisphere stroke: comparisons of alerting, orienting, and executive control performance using an auditory Attention Network Test.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2021-05-07

8.  Individual Differences in Distinct Components of Attention are Linked to Anatomical Variations in Distinct White Matter Tracts.

Authors:  Sumit Niogi; Pratik Mukherjee; Jamshid Ghajar; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  Attention in neglect and extinction: assessing the degree of correspondence between visual and auditory impairments using matched tasks.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  A new test of attention in listening (TAIL) predicts auditory performance.

Authors:  Yu-Xuan Zhang; Johanna G Barry; David R Moore; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.