Literature DB >> 16980696

Causal inference for non-mortality outcomes in the presence of death.

Brian L Egleston1, Daniel O Scharfstein, Ellen E Freeman, Sheila K West.   

Abstract

Evaluation of the causal effect of a baseline exposure on a morbidity outcome at a fixed time point is often complicated when study participants die before morbidity outcomes are measured. In this setting, the causal effect is only well defined for the principal stratum of subjects who would live regardless of the exposure. Motivated by gerontologic researchers interested in understanding the causal effect of vision loss on emotional distress in a population with a high mortality rate, we investigate the effect among those who would live both with and without vision loss. Since this subpopulation is not readily identifiable from the data and vision loss is not randomized, we introduce a set of scientifically driven assumptions to identify the causal effect. Since these assumptions are not empirically verifiable, we embed our methodology within a sensitivity analysis framework. We apply our method using the first three rounds of survey data from the Salisbury Eye Evaluation, a population-based cohort study of older adults. We also present a simulation study that validates our method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16980696     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  23 in total

1.  Longitudinal Data with Follow-up Truncated by Death: Match the Analysis Method to Research Aims.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Laura L Johnson; Brian L Egleston; Paula H Diehr
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Inference for mutually exclusive competing events through a mixture of generalized gamma distributions.

Authors:  William Checkley; Roy G Brower; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Incident preclinical mobility disability (PCMD) increases future risk of new difficulty walking and reduction in walking activity.

Authors:  Carlos O Weiss; Jennifer L Wolff; Brian Egleston; Christopher L Seplaki; Linda P Fried
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Does Finasteride Affect the Severity of Prostate Cancer? A Causal Sensitivity Analysis.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Mary W Redman; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Doubly robust estimation and causal inference in longitudinal studies with dropout and truncation by death.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Gregory E Hicks; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  A tutorial on principal stratification-based sensitivity analysis: application to smoking cessation studies.

Authors:  Brian L Egleston; Karen L Cropsey; Amy B Lazev; Carolyn J Heckman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  A simple method for principal strata effects when the outcome has been truncated due to death.

Authors:  Yasutaka Chiba; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  CAUSAL EFFECTS OF TREATMENTS FOR INFORMATIVE MISSING DATA DUE TO PROGRESSION/DEATH.

Authors:  Keunbaik Lee; Michael J Daniels; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  An Investigation of Selection Bias in Estimating Racial Disparity in Stroke Risk Factors.

Authors:  D Leann Long; George Howard; Dustin M Long; Suzanne Judd; Jennifer J Manly; Leslie A McClure; Virginia G Wadley; Monika M Safford; Ronit Katz; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Marginalized models for longitudinal ordinal data with application to quality of life studies.

Authors:  Keunbaik Lee; Michael J Daniels
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.