Literature DB >> 1698047

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic injuries. An analysis of management principles.

D H Wisner1, R L Wold, C F Frey.   

Abstract

Ninety-one pancreatic injuries, 47 from blunt trauma, were reviewed with respect to management principles stressed in qi previous reviews. The pancreatic complication rate was 25%. Blunt injury was suspected preoperatively in only 30%. Even short-term observation led to morbidity. Operations done more than 6 hours after admission had a higher complication rate (45%) than those done less than 6 hours after admission (18%). Penrose drainage without a sump was not associated with increased complications. Distal pancreatectomy was done 32 times; splenectomy was done in only 18 patients. Individual duct ligation was rarely done and did not result in a high fistula rate. Pancreatic stump oversew with nonabsorbable suture was associated with a higher rate of pancreatic complications than absorbable suture (58% vs 30%). Only 56% of patients receiving distal pancreatectomy required hyperalimentation. Postoperative serum amylase values were not useful, and amylase values from drainage fluid predicted complications only when they were above 100,000 U/L. Details of pancreatic trauma management are less important than early operation in minimizing morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1698047     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410210035004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  20 in total

1.  Pancreatic injury: an audit and a practical approach.

Authors:  S el-Boghdadly; Z al-Yousef; K al Bedah
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?

Authors:  D A Potoka; B A Gaines; A Leppäniemi; A B Peitzman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Major pancreatic duct continuity is the crucial determinant in the management of blunt pancreatic injury: a pancreatographic classification.

Authors:  Being-Chuan Lin; Yon-Cheong Wong; Ray-Jade Chen; Nai-Jen Liu; Cheng-Hsien Wu; Tsann-Long Hwang; Yu-Pao Hsu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Non-operative management of a grade IV pancreatic injury.

Authors:  Bharati Hiremath; Nishchit Hegde
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-30

5.  Magnitude, Severity, and Outcome of Traumatic Pancreatic Injury at a Level I Trauma Center in India.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Subodh Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Biplab Mishra; Maneesh Singhal; Atin Kumar; Pramod Garg
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Detecting blunt pancreatic injuries.

Authors:  Robert L Cirillo; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The use of MRCP in the detection of pancreatic injuries after blunt trauma.

Authors:  Alfonso Ragozzino; Riccardo Manfredi; Mariano Scaglione; Rosaria De Ritis; Stefania Romano; Antonio Rotondo
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-03-26

8.  Pancreatic laceration in a female collegiate soccer athlete: a case report.

Authors:  Michael E Powers; Michelle Tropeano; Diana Priestman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  R Lahiri; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Blunt pancreatic trauma: evaluation with MDCT technology.

Authors:  Robert W Gordon; Stephan W Anderson; Al Ozonoff; Satinder Rekhi; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.