Literature DB >> 16980140

More medical journals should inform their contributors about three key principles of graph construction.

Milo A Puhan1, Gerben ter Riet, Klaus Eichler, Johann Steurer, Lucas M Bachmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify key principles of graph construction and to review guidance on graph construction provided by medical journals. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Review of a prevailing model of graph comprehension and survey of authors' instructions for all 120 core medical journals as indexed by PubMed.
RESULTS: Graph construction should meet three requirements for optimal graph comprehension: Data symbols should be clearly distinguishable to enable their visual detection. Second, the data should be arranged in such a way that estimation of values and important relationships in the data is facilitated, and third, there should be a full explanation of all graph elements and of how the data were obtained. Seven journals (5.8%) provided recommendations on graph construction. Six journals put emphasis primarily on the explanation of graph elements and, to a lesser extent, on the visual detection of data symbols. Recommendations of the seventh journal focused mostly on how to enhance estimation of important relationships. All journals presented single recommendations whose selection seemed unstructured and not based on key principles of graph construction.
CONCLUSION: Medical journals should order their instructions according to the three key aspects of graph construction.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16980140     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

Review 1.  How to interpret figures in reports of clinical trials.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Thomas G Travison; Lisa M Wruck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-24

Review 2.  Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome.

Authors:  Sukhmeet S Panesar; Christopher Rao; Joshua A Vecht; Saqeb B Mirza; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Richard Morris; Joe Rosenthal; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Best practices for data visualization: creating and evaluating a report for an evidence-based fall prevention program.

Authors:  Srijesa Khasnabish; Zoe Burns; Madeline Couch; Mary Mullin; Randall Newmark; Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Physician Interpretation of Data of Uncertain Clinical Utility in Oncology Prescription Drug Promotion.

Authors:  Vanessa Boudewyns; Amie C O'Donoghue; Ryan S Paquin; Kathryn J Aikin; Kate Ferriola-Bruckenstein; Victoria M Scott
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-09-28

5.  Figures in clinical trial reports: current practice & scope for improvement.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Thomas G Travison; Lisa M Wruck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Statistics and medicine: the indispensable know-how of the researcher.

Authors:  R Romano; E Gambale
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2013-01-04

7.  On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.

Authors:  Yukiko Asada; Hannah Abel; Chris Skedgel; Grace Warner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 8.  A critical review of graphics for subgroup analyses in clinical trials.

Authors:  Nicolás M Ballarini; Yi-Da Chiu; Franz König; Martin Posch; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 1.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.