Literature DB >> 16979810

Alterations of energy metabolism and glutathione levels of HL-60 cells induced by methacrylates present in composite resins.

G Nocca1, F De Palma, A Minucci, P De Sole, G E Martorana, C Callà, C Morlacchi, M L Gozzo, G Gambarini, C Chimenti, B Giardina, A Lupi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Methacrylic compounds such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and bisphenol A glycerolate (1 glycerol/phenol) dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA) are largely present in auto- or photopolymerizable composite resins. Since the polymerization reaction is never complete, these molecules are released into the oral cavity tissues and biological fluids where they could cause local adverse effects. The aim of this work was to verify the hypothesis that the biological effects of HEMA, TEGDMA and Bis-GMA - at a non-cytotoxic concentration - depend on the interaction with mitochondria and exert consequent alterations of energy metabolism, GSH levels and the related pathways in human promyelocytic cell line (HL-60).
METHODS: The biological effects of methacrylic monomers were determined by analyzing the following parameters: GSH concentration, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) and glutathione reductase (GR) activity, oxygen and glucose consumption and lactate production along with cell differentiation and proliferation.
RESULTS: All monomers induced both cellular differentiation and decrease in oxygen consumption. Cells treated with TEGDMA and Bis-GMA showed a significant enhancement of glucose consumption and lactate production. TEGDMA and HEMA induced GSH depletion stimulating G6PDH and GR activity.
CONCLUSIONS: All the monomers under study affect the metabolism of HL-60 cells and show differentiating activity. Since alterations in cellular metabolism occurred at compound concentrations well below cytotoxic levels, the changes in energy metabolism and glutathione redox balance could be considered as potential mechanisms for inducing clinical and sub-clinical adverse effects and thus providing useful parameters when testing biocompatibility of dental materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979810     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  6 in total

1.  N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC)-Directed Detoxification of Methacryloxylethyl Cetyl Ammonium Chloride (DMAE-CB).

Authors:  Yang Jiao; Sai Ma; Jing Li; Lequn Shan; Yingjie Wang; Min Tian; Yanwei Yang; Jinlong Sun; Jinghao Ban; Jihua Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Toxicity test of a dental commercial composite.

Authors:  Santa Ponce-Bravo; Constantino Ledesma-Montes; José-Luis Martínez-Rivera; Maricela Garcés-Ortíz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Biocompatibility Evaluation of Four Dentin Adhesives Used as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials.

Authors:  Olga Cortés; Antonia Alcaina; Antonia Bernabé
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  The Effect of Selected Dental Materials Used in Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics, Surgery, and Orthodontics as Well as during the Periodontal Treatment on the Redox Balance in the Oral Cavity.

Authors:  Izabela Zieniewska; Mateusz Maciejczyk; Anna Zalewska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Effects of dental methacrylates on oxygen consumption and redox status of human pulp cells.

Authors:  Giuseppina Nocca; Cinzia Callà; Giuseppe Ettore Martorana; Loredana Cicillini; Sandro Rengo; Alessandro Lupi; Massimo Cordaro; Maria Luisa Gozzo; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on Structural and Physical Properties of Resin-Based Dental Composites.

Authors:  Abdul Samad Khan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.