Literature DB >> 16979737

Radical cystectomy with ultrasound-guided partial prostatectomy for bladder cancer: a complication-preventing concept.

Heiko Wunderlich1, Marco Wolf, Olaf Reichelt, Rosemarie Fröber, Jörg Schubert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy has been the reference standard for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, this kind of therapy does have an impact on the patient's quality of life. For this reason, we performed prostate-sparing surgery during radical cystectomy without compromising the oncologic outcome.
METHODS: From December 2003 to August 2005, 31 patients with a mean age of 63.6 +/- 8 years (range 48 to 79) underwent apex-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy for invasive bladder cancer. All patients underwent transurethral biopsy in the prostatic urethra to exclude urothelial tumor and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate to diagnose concomitant prostate cancer. Patients with a prostate-specific antigen level greater than 4 ng/mL were excluded from prostate-sparing cystectomy. The mean follow-up period was 12 months.
RESULTS: The postoperative pathologic stage was pTis in 2 patients, pTa in 1, pT1 in 3, pT2 in 20, pT3 in 5, and pN+ in 4 patients. We found no prostate cancer on histopathologic evaluation. Except for 4 patients, no patient had deterioration of sexual function. Except for 2 patients, all patients were fully continent.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical cystectomy with prostate-sparing surgery in patients with invasive bladder cancer resulted in improved continence and improved erectile function. Additionally, with apex-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy, we were able to create a wide neovesicourethral anastomosis to prevent strictures, urinary retention, and mucous retention. It is absolutely necessary that this procedure be restricted to highly selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979737     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of bladder cancer. Value of radical prostate-sparing cystectomy].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; D Porres; D Pfister
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Is sparing the prostate still considered radical cystectomy? The case against prostate-sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Kotb; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The case for prostate capsule-sparing radical cystectomy in selected patients.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Jehonathan Pinthus
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Prostate capsule sparing radical cystectomy: oncologic safety and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-04

5.  Incidental prostate cancer at the time of cystectomy: the incidence and clinicopathological features in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Jiahua Pan; Wei Xue; Jianjun Sha; Hu Yang; Fan Xu; Hanqing Xuan; Dong Li; Yiran Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.