Literature DB >> 16979735

Clinical model of lifetime cost of treating bladder cancer and associated complications.

Elenir B C Avritscher1, Catherine D Cooksley, H Barton Grossman, Anita L Sabichi, Lois Hamblin, Colin P Dinney, Linda S Elting.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the lifetime cost of bladder cancer and the contribution of complications to the total costs.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of a retrospective cohort of 208 patients with bladder cancer who registered at our comprehensive cancer center from 1991 to 1999. We multiplied the number of resources used during management of bladder cancer by their unit charges. We converted charges into costs using the Medicare cost-to-charge ratio and inflated these to 2005 U.S. dollars. We estimated future costs by creating two extreme hypothetical scenarios. In the best-case scenario, we assumed patients with superficial disease developed recurrences at the cohort's mean rate and that patients with muscle-invasive disease were disease free after definitive therapy. Survival was based on the U.S. life expectancy in both cases. In the worst-case scenario, we assumed patients with superficial disease developed muscle-invasive disease and that all patients subsequently died of bladder cancer.
RESULTS: The average cost of bladder cancer was 65,158 dollars among the cohort patients. Sixty percent of this cost (39,393 dollars) was associated with surveillance and treatment of recurrences, and 30% (19,811 dollars) was attributable to complications. The lifetime cost of bladder cancer was lower for the worst-case scenario (99,270 dollars) than for the best-case scenario (120,684 dollars). However, a greater proportion of the costs were attributable to complications with the worst-case scenario (43%, 42,290 dollars) compared with the best (28%, 34,169 dollars).
CONCLUSIONS: The management of bladder cancer and its associated complications results in a major economic burden. More cost-effective surveillance strategies and approaches for preventing complications are crucial to minimizing the disease's clinical and economic consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979735     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  95 in total

1.  Canadian guidelines for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a focus on intravesical therapy.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Ashish M Kamat; Alexander Zlotta; Bernard H Bochner; Ronald Moore; Alan So; Jonathan Izawa; Ricardo A Rendon; Louis Lacombe; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Lifestyle and nutritional modifiable factors in the prevention and treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Marilyn L Kwan; Brandon Garren; Matthew E Nielsen; Li Tang
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Recurrence and upstaging rates of T1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder on repeat resection in a Canadian, resource-limited, healthcare system.

Authors:  Adam Kinnaird; Peter Dromparis; Howard Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A randomized controlled trial of celecoxib to prevent recurrence of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anita L Sabichi; J Jack Lee; H Barton Grossman; Suyu Liu; Ellen Richmond; Bogdan A Czerniak; Jorge De la Cerda; Craig Eagle; Jaye L Viner; J Lynn Palmer; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-31

6.  Prognostic value of urinary cytology and other biomarkers for recurrence and progression in bladder cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Michael D Bell; Faysal A Yafi; Fadi Brimo; Jordan Steinberg; Armen G Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Serum Metabolic Profiling Identified a Distinct Metabolic Signature in Bladder Cancer Smokers: A Key Metabolic Enzyme Associated with Patient Survival.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Amara; Chandrashekar R Ambati; Venkatrao Vantaku; Danthasinghe Waduge Badrajee Piyarathna; Sri Ramya Donepudi; Shiva Shankar Ravi; James M Arnold; Vasanta Putluri; Gurkamal Chatta; Khurshid A Guru; Hoda Badr; Martha K Terris; Roni J Bollag; Arun Sreekumar; Andrea B Apolo; Nagireddy Putluri
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Efficacy and safety of pirarubicin combined with hyaluronic acid for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after transurethral resection: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Weiping Huang; Feng Wang; Cunzao Wu; Weilie Hu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Perioperative Intravesical Chemotherapy for Patients WithNon-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Understanding the Extent of and Sources of Variation in Guideline-recommended Use.

Authors:  Devon K Check; David S Aaronson; Matthew E Nielsen; Valerie S Lee; Isaac J Ergas; Janise M Roh; Lawrence H Kushi; Li Tang; Marilyn L Kwan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  NTPDase3 and ecto-5'-nucleotidase/CD73 are differentially expressed during mouse bladder cancer progression.

Authors:  Liliana Rockenbach; Elizandra Braganhol; Fabrícia Dietrich; Fabrício Figueiró; Manoella Pugliese; Maria Isabel Albano Edelweiss; Fernanda Bueno Morrone; Jean Sévigny; Ana Maria Oliveira Battastini
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.765

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.