OBJECTIVE: The role of mitochondria and in particular of mitochondrial uncoupling in the mechanism of cardioprotection is not defined. In the accompanying paper we have shown that pretreatment of isolated rat hearts with a low concentration (100 nM) of FCCP, prior to global ischaemia, is cardioprotective, while 300 nM FCCP exacerbates injury. Here we define the mitochondrial responses to increasing concentrations of FCCP and also to explore the equivalence of the cardioprotective doses of diazoxide. METHODS: Changes in mitochondrial respiration in response to FCCP and diazoxide were determined in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. In addition, mitochondrial state was monitored using confocal microscopy to record mitochondrial potential (TMRM) and redox state (NADH) during FCCP and diazoxide treatment. Myocytes were also voltage-clamped and whole cell currents recorded in response to 100 nM FCCP. RESULTS: FCCP (10-1000 nM) caused significant dose-dependent increase in oxygen consumption. Diazoxide (30 microM) failed to cause any measurable change in mitochondrial function. FCCP at 100 nM caused mitochondrial oxidation, but no change in mitochondrial membrane potential or (sarc)K(ATP) channel current, while at 300 nM, FCCP caused significant mitochondrial depolarisation. Diazoxide failed to induce any mitochondrial oxidation or depolarisation. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of FCCP that cause mitochondrial oxidation without depolarisation are cardioprotective. Higher FCCP concentrations dissipate mitochondrial membrane potential and exacerbate injury. This establishes the principle that mild mitochondrial uncoupling activates a protective mechanism. Diazoxide did not cause mitochondrial oxidation or mitochondrial depolarisation, suggesting it induces protection via another mechanism.
OBJECTIVE: The role of mitochondria and in particular of mitochondrial uncoupling in the mechanism of cardioprotection is not defined. In the accompanying paper we have shown that pretreatment of isolated rat hearts with a low concentration (100 nM) of FCCP, prior to global ischaemia, is cardioprotective, while 300 nM FCCP exacerbates injury. Here we define the mitochondrial responses to increasing concentrations of FCCP and also to explore the equivalence of the cardioprotective doses of diazoxide. METHODS: Changes in mitochondrial respiration in response to FCCP and diazoxide were determined in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. In addition, mitochondrial state was monitored using confocal microscopy to record mitochondrial potential (TMRM) and redox state (NADH) during FCCP and diazoxide treatment. Myocytes were also voltage-clamped and whole cell currents recorded in response to 100 nM FCCP. RESULTS:FCCP (10-1000 nM) caused significant dose-dependent increase in oxygen consumption. Diazoxide (30 microM) failed to cause any measurable change in mitochondrial function. FCCP at 100 nM caused mitochondrial oxidation, but no change in mitochondrial membrane potential or (sarc)K(ATP) channel current, while at 300 nM, FCCP caused significant mitochondrial depolarisation. Diazoxide failed to induce any mitochondrial oxidation or depolarisation. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of FCCP that cause mitochondrial oxidation without depolarisation are cardioprotective. Higher FCCP concentrations dissipate mitochondrial membrane potential and exacerbate injury. This establishes the principle that mild mitochondrial uncoupling activates a protective mechanism. Diazoxide did not cause mitochondrial oxidation or mitochondrial depolarisation, suggesting it induces protection via another mechanism.
Authors: J P Sarkey; M Chu; M McShane; E Bovo; Y Ait Mou; A V Zima; P P de Tombe; G L Kartje; J L Martin Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Aigul Zhunussova; Bhaswati Sen; Leah Friedman; Sultan Tuleukhanov; Ari D Brooks; Richard Sensenig; Zulfiya Orynbayeva Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Andrew P Wojtovich; David M Williams; Marcin K Karcz; Coeli M B Lopes; Daniel A Gray; Keith W Nehrke; Paul S Brookes Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Paul W Venable; Tyson G Taylor; Katie J Sciuto; Jerry Zhao; Junko Shibayama; Mark Warren; Kenneth W Spitzer; Alexey V Zaitsev Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Aziz Ul Rehman; Ayad G Anwer; Martin E Gosnell; Saabah B Mahbub; Guozhen Liu; Ewa M Goldys Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Brandon M Kenwood; Janelle L Weaver; Amandeep Bajwa; Ivan K Poon; Frances L Byrne; Beverley A Murrow; Joseph A Calderone; Liping Huang; Ajit S Divakaruni; Jose L Tomsig; Kohki Okabe; Ryan H Lo; G Cameron Coleman; Linda Columbus; Zhen Yan; Jeffrey J Saucerman; Jeffrey S Smith; Jeffrey W Holmes; Kevin R Lynch; Kodi S Ravichandran; Seiichi Uchiyama; Webster L Santos; George W Rogers; Mark D Okusa; Douglas A Bayliss; Kyle L Hoehn Journal: Mol Metab Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 7.422
Authors: Jimmy Zhang; Sergiy M Nadtochiy; William R Urciuoli; Paul S Brookes Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.733