Literature DB >> 1697953

Phrenic nerve stimulation for central ventilatory failure with bipolar and four-pole electrode systems.

G A Baer1, P P Talonen, J M Shneerson, H Markkula, G Exner, F C Wells.   

Abstract

A multi-channel phrenic nerve stimulator developed in Tampere has been implanted into seven patients with C2-tetraplegia and into three patients with central sleep apneas. Six bipolar cuff electrodes were implanted bilaterally into the neck. Two four-pole cuff and 14 four-pole noncuff electrodes were used in seven patients and to replace one bipolar electrode. Four-pole electrodes were implanted within the thorax. Seven patients achieved total independence from conventional ventilators within 4 months of implantation, and one for 18 hours each day. Two patients died 12 days and 3 months after implantation and two patients after having achieved independence from mechanical ventilators from causes unrelated to the stimulators. Reoperations were necessary because of dislocation of receivers, electrodes, electrode lesions, nerve injuries, and technical failures in seven patients. Most of the problems appeared in two patients with obesity and in three patients with very thin phrenic nerves. Single unit prototypes failed technically more frequently than units of prototype serial fabrication. New electrode design, progress in the manufacture of receivers, and improved implantation technique should help to diminish failures in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1697953     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Neural morphological effects of long-term implantation of the self-sizing spiral cuff nerve electrode.

Authors:  E Romero; J F Denef; J Delbeke; A Robert; C Veraart
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Inspiratory muscle pacing in spinal cord injury: case report and clinical commentary.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Raymond P Onders; Anthony Ignagni; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Evaluating the evidence: is phrenic nerve stimulation a safe and effective tool for decreasing ventilator dependence in patients with high cervical spinal cord injuries and central hypoventilation?

Authors:  Emily P Sieg; Russell A Payne; Sprague Hazard; Elias Rizk
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Microstimulators and intramuscular hook electrodes for the stimulation of respiratory muscles.

Authors:  James S Walter; Robert B Dunn; Robert D Wurster; Franco Laghi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Neuroprosthetic devices: how far are we from recovering movement in paralyzed patients?

Authors:  Joseph J Pancrazio; P Hunter Peckham
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.618

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.