Literature DB >> 16979375

The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay and related techniques applied to genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies: a critical review.

Franck A Atienzar1, Awadhesh N Jha.   

Abstract

More than 9000 papers using the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) or related techniques (e.g. the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR)) have been published from 1990 to 2005. The RAPD method has been initially used to detect polymorphism in genetic mapping, taxonomy and phylogenetic studies and later in genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies. Despite their extensive use, these techniques have also attracted some criticisms, mainly for lack of reproducibility. In the light of their widespread applications, the objectives of this review are to (1) identify the potential factors affecting the optimisation of the RAPD and AP-PCR assays, (2) critically describe and analyse these techniques in genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies, (3) compare the RAPD assay with other well used methodologies, (4) further elucidate the impact of DNA damage and mutations on the RAPD profiles, and finally (5) provide some recommendations/guidelines to further improve the applications of the assays and to help the identification of the factors responsible for the RAPD changes. It is suggested that after proper optimisation, the RAPD is a reliable, sensitive and reproducible assay, has the potential to detect a wide range of DNA damage (e.g. DNA adducts, DNA breakage) as well as mutations (point mutations and large rearrangements) and therefore can be applied to genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the changes in RAPD profiles is difficult since many factors can affect the generation of RAPD profiles. It is therefore important that these factors are identified and taken into account while using these assays. On the other hand, further analyses of the relevant bands generated in RAPD profile allow not only to identify some of the molecular events implicated in the genomic instability but also to discover genes playing key roles, particularly in the initiation and development of malignancy. Finally, to elucidate the potential genotoxic effects of environmental contaminants, a powerful strategy could be firstly to use the RAPD assay as a screening method and secondly to apply more specific methods measuring for instance DNA adducts, gene mutations or cytogenetic effects. It is also envisaged that these assays (i.e. RAPD and related techniques), which reflect effects at whole genome level, would continue to complement the use of emerging technologies (e.g. microarrays which aim to quantify expression of individual genes).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979375     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  41 in total

1.  Molecular detection of bacterial contamination in gnotobiotic rodent units.

Authors:  Christopher D Packey; Michael T Shanahan; Sayeed Manick; Maureen A Bower; Melissa Ellermann; Susan L Tonkonogy; Ian M Carroll; R Balfour Sartor
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2013-07-24

2.  RAPD-PCR and real-time PCR HRM based genetic variation evaluations of Urtica dioica parts, ecotypes and evaluations of morphotypes in Turkey.

Authors:  Irem Uzonur; Gamze Akdeniz; Zeynep Katmer; Seyda Karaman Ersoy
Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-12-31

3.  Oxidative and genotoxic damages in plants in response to heavy metal stress and maintenance of genome stability.

Authors:  Subhajit Dutta; Mehali Mitra; Puja Agarwal; Kalyan Mahapatra; Sayanti De; Upasana Sett; Sujit Roy
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2018-08-08

4.  Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of copper oxychloride in cultured human lymphocytes using cytogenetic and molecular tests.

Authors:  Suleyman Bayram; Ahmet Genc; Mehmet Buyukleyla; Eyyup Rencuzogullari
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Microbial diversity of landslide soils assessed by RFLP and SSCP fingerprints.

Authors:  Marco Guida; Paolo Losanno Cannavacciuolo; Mara Cesarano; Marco Borra; Elio Biffali; Raffaella D'Alessandro; Bruna De Felice
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mechanistic and prognostic significance of aberrant methylation in the molecular pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Diego F Calvisi; Sara Ladu; Alexis Gorden; Miriam Farina; Ju-Seog Lee; Elizabeth A Conner; Insa Schroeder; Valentina M Factor; Snorri S Thorgeirsson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Mineral nutrient imbalance, total antioxidants level and DNA damage in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) exposed to heavy metals.

Authors:  Darinka Gjorgieva; Tatjana Kadifkova Panovska; Tatjana Ruskovska; Katerina Bačeva; Trajče Stafilov
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2013-10

8.  Response of Tradescantia plants to oxidative stress induced by heavy metal pollution of soils from industrial areas.

Authors:  Raimondas Šiukšta; Skaistė Bondzinskaitė; Violeta Kleizaitė; Donatas Žvingila; Ričardas Taraškevičius; Laurynas Mockeliūnas; Asta Stapulionytė; Kristina Mak; Tatjana Čėsnienė
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Different DNA methylation patterns detected by the Amplified Methylation Polymorphism Polymerase Chain Reaction (AMP PCR) technique among various cell types of bulls.

Authors:  Nawapen Phutikanit; Junpen Suwimonteerabutr; Dion Harrison; Michael D'Occhio; Bernie Carroll; Mongkol Techakumphu
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Assessment of DNA damage by RAPD in Paracentrotus lividus embryos exposed to amniotic fluid from residents living close to waste landfill sites.

Authors:  Maurizio Guida; Marco Guida; Bruna De Felice; Daniela Santafede; Raffaella D'Alessandro; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Marianna Scognamiglio; Cinzia Ferrara; Giuseppe Bifulco; Carmine Nappi
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.