Literature DB >> 16979285

Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees.

Hilary Nixon1, Jean-Daniel M Saphores.   

Abstract

The growth of electronic waste (e-waste) is of increasing concern because of its toxic content and low recycling rates. The e-waste recycling infrastructure needs to be developed, yet little is known about people's willingness to fund its expansion. This paper examines this issue based on a 2004 mail survey of California households. Using an ordered logit model, we find that age, income, beliefs about government and business roles, proximity to existing recycling facilities, community density, education, and environmental attitudes are significant factors for explaining people's willingness to pay an advanced recycling fee (ARF) for electronics. Most respondents are willing to support a 1% ARF. Our results suggest that policymakers should target middle-aged and older adults, improve programs in communities with existing recycling centers or in rural communities, and consider public-private partnerships for e-waste recycling programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979285     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  Factors influencing community participation in the management of household electronic waste in West Surabaya, Indonesia.

Authors:  Ellina S Pandebesie; Ira Indrihastuti; Susi A Wilujeng; Idaa Warmadewanthi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Generation of domestic waste electrical and electronic equipment on Fernando de Noronha Island: qualitative and quantitative aspects.

Authors:  Dhiego Raphael Rodrigues Araujo; José Diego de Oliveira; Vanice Fragoso Selva; Maisa Mendonça Silva; Simone Machado Santos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  An evaluation of the social dimensions in public participation in rural domestic waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Keith W Hipel; Mark L Hanson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Managing e-waste from a closed-loop lifecycle perspective: China's challenges and fund policy redesign.

Authors:  Tingting Tian; Guangfu Liu; Hussein Yasemi; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Towards sustainable sanitation management: Establishing the costs and willingness to pay for emptying and transporting sludge in rural districts with high rates of access to latrines.

Authors:  Soumya Balasubramanya; Barbara Evans; Richard Hardy; Rizwan Ahmed; Ahasan Habib; N S M Asad; Mominur Rahman; M Hasan; Digbijoy Dey; Louise Fletcher; Miller Alonso Camargo-Valero; Krishna Chaitanya Rao; Sudarshana Fernando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What makes residents more willing to participate in source separation of waste masks under the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Kaihan Cai; Wenlei Zeng; Qingbin Song; Yangyang Liang; Shaohong Peng; Jiaqi Hu; Jinhui Li
Journal:  J Mater Cycles Waste Manag       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.579

7.  What Drives Households' Payment for Waste Disposal and Recycling Behaviours? Empirical Evidence from South Africa's General Household Survey.

Authors:  Abiodun Olusola Omotayo; Abeeb Babatunde Omotoso; Adebola Saidat Daud; Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi; Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.