Literature DB >> 16979284

Policy and practice in Myanmar's protected area system.

U Myint Aung1.   

Abstract

Myanmar's protected area (PA) system began nearly 150 years ago under royal patronage. Park policies and practices, embodied in 19 pieces of legislation developed sporadically during and after the colonial period. As a result of the FAO-UNDP's Nature Conservation and National Parks Project (1981-1985) the government established the Nature & Wildlife Conservation Division and placed it within the Forest Department as the agency responsible for PA management. As a consequence the number of parks increased from 14 to 33. Myanmar's median park size is less than 50 km(2), but only five parks (15%) are larger than 1000 km(2). Most parks conserve terrestrial habitats; parks encompassing inland wetlands, mangrove, and marine habitats are limited in number and size. Existing PAs unequally represent Myanmar's ecosystems; the Malay Transition, Burmese coast, Burmese Transition and Cardamom Mountains bio-units are under-represented within the system. The effective total PA size (i.e., area of all parks less the area of 13 paper parks) is currently about 2.1%. Budgetary support for parks increased 11% since 1996, but is insufficient to address park needs, particularly in remote parks that are understaffed. Limited education and training of PA staff is a major factor limiting effective park management. Fifty-eight percent of park wardens are educated as foresters, and 42% have university degrees. The average posting in a park is 4 years, which is less than ideal for management continuity. Recommended actions to secure Myanmar's PAs include evaluation and reformulation of policies, increasing representation of Myanmar's habitats within the PA system, management planning, and standardizing protocols for anti-poaching patrols and other forms of law enforcement. Improved leadership training for wardens and range forest officers can also improve park management. Funding for community relations and more integrated management of parks and people can reduce conflicts, while environmental education and outreach activities can provide some needed services. Finally, new ways and means are needed to support these activities. Myanmar's PAs need creative and sustainable means of support, including partnerships with non-government organizations to supplement traditional means of support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979284     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  8 in total

1.  Hunting, livelihoods and declining wildlife in the Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary, North Myanmar.

Authors:  Madhu Rao; Saw Htun; Than Zaw; Than Myint
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012.

Authors:  Daniel R Richards; Daniel A Friess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate: a review of threats and implications for conservation planning in Myanmar.

Authors:  Madhu Rao; Steven G Platt; Robert Tizard; Colin Poole; James E M Watson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Developing a national tiger action plan for The Union of Myanmar.

Authors:  Antony J Lynam; Saw Tun Khaing; Khin Maung Zaw
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Using global datasets to create environmental profiles for data-poor regions: a case from the Irrawaddy and Salween River Basins.

Authors:  Aura Salmivaara; Matti Kummu; Marko Keskinen; Olli Varis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Dramatic cropland expansion in Myanmar following political reforms threatens biodiversity.

Authors:  Yuchen Zhang; Graham W Prescott; Rebecca E Tay; Borame L Dickens; Edward L Webb; Saw Htun; Robert J Tizard; Madhu Rao; Luis Roman Carrasco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  An international scoping review of rangers' precarious employment conditions.

Authors:  Michelle Anagnostou; Virginia Gunn; Oriona Nibbs; Carles Muntaner; Brent Doberstein
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2022-02-01

8.  The value of countryside elements in the conservation of a threatened arboreal marsupial Petaurus norfolcensis in agricultural landscapes of south-eastern Australia--the disproportional value of scattered trees.

Authors:  Mason J Crane; David B Lindenmayer; Ross B Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.