Literature DB >> 16979053

Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions in the community setting: eighty-three arthroscopically confirmed cases.

Bryan L Reuss1, Randy Schwartzberg, Michael B Zlatkin, Andrew Cooperman, John R Dixon.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown in the literature to have high accuracy for the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesions. However, these studies have been performed at specialized institutions and have not been evaluated for community settings. Our hypothesis was that MRI diagnosis of SLAP lesions in the community setting is not as accurate as suggested by previous literature. The MRI reports for 83 consecutive surgically confirmed type II SLAP lesions were evaluated. The findings regarding the presence of SLAP lesions were documented from the community radiologists' MRI readings. Two blinded, fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated these same 83 MRIs, as well as 17 MRIs with surgically confirmed normal superior labra. The musculoskeletal radiologists also used a visual analog scale to subjectively grade the quality of each MRI. MRIs were performed at 14 different centers and were read by 28 different community radiologists. There were 37 noncontrast MRIs and 46 MRI arthrograms. The community radiologists accurately identified 51% of the SLAP lesions. The sensitivities for the community radiologists were significantly better for the MRI arthrograms than for the noncontrast MRIs (P = .0002). For the two musculoskeletal radiologists, the sensitivities were 60% and 67.5%, and the specificities were 71% and 76.5%. The accuracies for the musculoskeletal radiologists were 62% and 69%. One of the musculoskeletal radiologists had significant correlation between the visual analog score and MRI diagnostic accuracy (P = .0006). The sensitivity for one of the musculoskeletal radiologists was significantly greater than the sensitivity for the community radiologists (P = .0063). The accuracies between the other musculoskeletal radiologist and the community radiologists were not significantly different (P = .0577). In this community setting, MRI was not accurate for the diagnosis of SLAP lesions. Musculoskeletal radiologists were more accurate than the community radiologists; however, the musculoskeletal radiologists were not as accurate as previous literature might predict.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16979053     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  A comparison of magnetic resonance arthrography and arthroscopic findings in the assessment of anterior shoulder dislocations.

Authors:  R W Jordan; R Naeem; K Srinivas; G Shyamalan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Outcome of the isolated SLAP lesions and analysis of the results according to the injury mechanisms.

Authors:  Jung Ho Park; Yong Seuk Lee; Joon Ho Wang; Haeng Kee Noh; Jae Gyun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Current concepts in shoulder examination of the overhead athlete.

Authors:  Robert Manske; Todd Ellenbecker
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

4.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose superior labrum anterior-posterior tears.

Authors:  Kent Sheridan; Christopher Kreulen; Sunny Kim; Walter Mak; Kirk Lewis; Richard Marder
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Moderate value of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging after non-dislocating shoulder trauma.

Authors:  Marc Banerjee; Jonas Müller-Hübenthal; Stefan Grimme; Maurice Balke; Bertil Bouillon; Rolf Lefering; Axel Goßmann; Sven Shafizadeh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Correlation between MRI and Arthroscopy in Diagnosis of Shoulder Pathology.

Authors:  Abhinav Bhatnagar; Sachin Bhonsle; Sonu Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

7.  Value of MR arthrography findings for pain relief after glenohumeral corticosteroid injections in the short term.

Authors:  Benjamin Fritz; Filippo Del Grande; Reto Sutter; Silvan Beeler; Cynthia K Peterson; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: dependence on the level of training of the performing radiologist for diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  John S Theodoropoulos; Gustav Andreisek; Edward J Harvey; Preston Wolin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Protocol for determining the diagnostic validity of physical examination maneuvers for shoulder pathology.

Authors:  Lyndsay Somerville; Dianne Bryant; Kevin Willits; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: Clinical and anatomic follow-up.

Authors:  John N Trantalis; Stephen Sohmer; Kristie D More; Atiba A Nelson; Ben Wong; Corinne H Dyke; Gail M Thornton; Richard S Boorman; Ian K Y Lo
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.