Literature DB >> 16978952

Predictors of breast cancer development in a high-risk population.

Jennifer Chun1, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Kathie-Ann Joseph, Beth Ann Ditkoff, Freya Schnabel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the strongest predictors of breast cancer in a high-risk population and to increase our understanding of the possible interactions between risk factors.
METHODS: The Women At Risk High-Risk Registry provided the study population. The variables of interest included age at enrollment, presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia, family history of breast cancer, body mass index, and Gail scores (5-year high-risk > or =1.7%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted with the Cox proportional hazards regression model and years of follow-up evaluation as the time scale.
RESULTS: Out of 1553 high-risk women, 79 (5%) developed breast cancer during a median follow-up period of 5 years. Results from the multivariate Cox model demonstrated that FHBC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.97), ADH (HR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16-3.13), LCIS (HR = 1.71; 95% CI, .99-2.95), and a body mass index > or =30 (HR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.14-4.35) were statistically significant predictors of breast cancer within this high-risk population.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support current literature showing the synergistic increase in risk for patients with ADH, LCIS, and a positive family history of breast cancer. Obesity was also a strong predictor of breast cancer risk, which suggests that there may be a potentiating effect of obesity on other risk factors. Obesity may represent a modifiable risk factor, providing women with an opportunity to reduce their risk with lifestyle modification. Women with a strong family history of breast cancer or a diagnosis of ADH or LCIS may benefit most from risk-reduction strategies, chemoprevention, and surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978952     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Targeting Obesity-Induced Macrophages during Preneoplastic Growth Promotes Mammary Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Activity, DNA Damage, and Tumor Formation.

Authors:  Tamara Chamberlin; Megan Clack; Caylee Silvers; Genevra Kuziel; Victoria Thompson; Haley Johnson; Lisa M Arendt
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia: an observational cohort study from the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease (BBD) cohort.

Authors:  Robert A Vierkant; Amy C Degnim; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; Ethan P Heinzen; Ryan D Frank; Stacey J Winham; Marlene H Frost; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Karthik Ghosh; Armando Manduca; Kathleen R Brandt; Dana H Whaley; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Barriers to adequate follow-up during adjuvant therapy may be important factors in the worse outcome for Black women after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Steve H Kim; Jeanne Ferrante; Bok Ran Won; Meera Hameed
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Changes in mammographic density over time in breast cancer cases and women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Meghan E Work; Laura L Reimers; Anne S Quante; Katherine D Crew; Amy Whiffen; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Beliefs about weight and breast cancer: an interview study with high risk women following a 12 month weight loss intervention.

Authors:  Claire E Wright; Michelle Harvie; Anthony Howell; D Gareth Evans; Nick Hulbert-Williams; Louise S Donnelly
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.857

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.