Literature DB >> 16978766

Arsenic sorption onto natural hematite, magnetite, and goethite.

Javier Giménez1, María Martínez, Joan de Pablo, Miquel Rovira, Lara Duro.   

Abstract

In this work the sorption of As(III) and As(V) on different natural iron oxides (hematite, magnetite, and goethite) has been studied as a function of different parameters. The sorption kinetics for the three iron oxides shows that equilibrium is reached in less than 2 days and the kinetics of sorption seems to be faster for goethite and magnetite than for hematite. The variation of the arsenic sorbed on the three different sorbents as a function of the equilibrium arsenic concentration in solution has been fitted with a non-competitive Langmuir isotherm. The main trend observed in the variation of the arsenic sorbed with pH is the decrease of the sorption on the three sorbents at alkaline pH values, which agrees with results found in the literature. Highest As(III) sorption was observed on hematite surface in all the pH range compared to goethite and magnetite. Natural minerals studied in this work had similar sorption capacities for arsenic than synthetic sorbents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  38 in total

1.  Adsorption of arsenic using high surface area magnetites.

Authors:  Kaoru Ohe; Tatsuya Oshima; Yoshinari Baba
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Arsenic sorption by red mud-modified biochar produced from rice straw.

Authors:  Chuan Wu; Liu Huang; Sheng-Guo Xue; Yu-Ying Huang; William Hartley; Meng-Qian Cui; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The effect of arsenic chemical form and mixing regime on arsenic mass transfer from soil to magnetite.

Authors:  Kyung Yang; Byung-Chul Kim; Kyoungphile Nam; Yongju Choi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Flow and sorption controls of groundwater arsenic in individual boreholes from bedrock aquifers in central Maine, USA.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Charles W Culbertson; Martha G Nielsen; Charles W Schalk; Carole D Johnson; Robert G Marvinney; Martin Stute; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Behavior and mechanism of arsenate adsorption on activated natural siderite: evidences from FTIR and XANES analysis.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Huaming Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Chemical forms and ecological risk of arsenic in the sediment of the Daliao River System in China.

Authors:  Shiliang Wang; Ping Wang; Bin Men; Chunye Lin; Mengchang He
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Model-Based Analysis of Arsenic Immobilization via Iron Mineral Transformation under Advective Flows.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Henning Prommer; Adam J Siade; Steven N Chillrud; Brian J Mailloux; Benjamin C Bostick
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Arsenic mobilization from iron oxides in the presence of oxalic acid under hydrodynamic conditions.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Benjamin C Bostick; Brian J Mailloux; James Jamieson; Beizhan Yan; Masha Pitiranggon; Steven N Chillrud
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 9.  Chitin and chitosan as multipurpose natural polymers for groundwater arsenic removal and AS2O3 delivery in tumor therapy.

Authors:  Letizia Da Sacco; Andrea Masotti
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Arsenite and ferrous iron oxidation linked to chemolithotrophic denitrification for the immobilization of arsenic in anoxic environments.

Authors:  Wenjiie Sun; Reyes Sierra-Alvarez; Lily Milner; Ron Oremland; Jim A Field
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.