Literature DB >> 16978719

What should (public) health insurance cover?

Michael Hoel1.   

Abstract

In any system of health insurance, a decision must be made about what treatments the insurance should cover. One way to make this decision is to rank treatments by their ratios of health benefits to treatment costs. If treatments that are not offered by the health insurance can be purchased out of pocket, the socially optimal ranking of treatments to be included in the health insurance is different from this standard cost-effectiveness rule. It is no longer necessarily true that treatments should be ranked higher the lower are treatment costs (for given health benefits). Moreover, the larger are the costs per treatment for a given benefit-cost ratio, the higher priority should the treatment be given. If the health budget in a public health system does not exceed the socially optimal size, treatments with sufficiently low costs should not be performed by the public health system if treatment may be purchased privately out of pocket.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  2 in total

1.  Optimal choice on prevention and cure: a new economic analysis.

Authors:  Mario Menegatti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-04-24

2.  Towards improved measurement of financial protection in health.

Authors:  Rodrigo Moreno-Serra; Christopher Millett; Peter C Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.069

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.