Literature DB >> 16978572

Spatial distribution of Aglais urticae (L.) and its host plant Urtica dioica (L.) in an agricultural landscape: implications for Bt maize risk assessment and post-market monitoring.

Achim Gathmann1, Ludger Wirooks, Jörg Eckert, Ingolf Schuphan.   

Abstract

Over the past decades, genes of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Berliner) (Bt) coding for protein toxins have been engineered into maize for protection against the European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis (Hbn.)). However, these transgenic plants may have an impact on non-target organisms. In particular, a potential hazard was identified for non-target lepidopteran larvae, if they consume Bt maize pollen on their host plants. Risk can be defined as a function of the effect of an event (hazard) and the likelihood of this event occurring. Although data on toxicity (hazard) are available from many lab and field studies, knowledge about the environmental exposure of European lepidopteran larvae is incomplete at the population level. Therefore we studied the distribution of small tortoiseshell caterpillars (Aglais urticae (L.)) and its host plant in an agricultural landscape in Germany, to estimate the potential population exposure to maize pollen. The results showed that larvae of the small tortoiseshell developed primarily on freshly sprouted nettle stands (Urtica dioica (L.)) in field margins, rather than adjacent to hedges and groves. However, the main distribution was at margins of cereal (non-maize) fields, where 70% of all larvae were found. This may be due the fact that cereals covered 54% of the survey area, while maize only covered 6.1%. On the other hand, maize fields seem so show higher food plant densities than cereal crops. The results must be interpreted carefully, as the data basis of the present study is very small, and the situation can vary between years due to crop rotation or other changes in agricultural practices. Therefore it is still questionable whether the small tortoiseshell is significantly exposed to maize pollen. For a conclusive risk assessment, more replications and surveys of larger areas in different intensively managed agricultural landscapes over several years are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978572     DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2006014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res        ISSN: 1635-7922


  5 in total

1.  Feeding Behaviour on Host Plants May Influence Potential Exposure to Bt Maize Pollen of Aglais Urticae Larvae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).

Authors:  Andreas Lang; Mathias Otto
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Are Adult Crambid Snout Moths (Crambinae) and Larval Stages of Lepidoptera Suitable Tools for an Environmental Monitoring of Transgenic Crops? - Implications of a Field Test.

Authors:  Andreas Lang; Matthias Dolek; Bernhard Theißen; Andreas Zapp
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  The cultivation of Bt corn producing Cry1Ac toxins does not adversely affect non-target arthropods.

Authors:  Yanyan Guo; Yanjie Feng; Yang Ge; Guillaume Tetreau; Xiaowen Chen; Xuehui Dong; Wangpeng Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental risk assessment of the DvSSJ1 dsRNA and the IPD072Aa protein to non-target organisms.

Authors:  Chad J Boeckman; Jennifer A Anderson; Christopher Linderblood; Taylor Olson; Jason Roper; Kristine Sturtz; Carl Walker; Rachel Woods
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.074

5.  A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe.

Authors:  J N Perry; Y Devos; S Arpaia; D Bartsch; A Gathmann; R S Hails; J Kiss; K Lheureux; B Manachini; S Mestdagh; G Neemann; F Ortego; J Schiemann; J B Sweet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.