Literature DB >> 16977704

Physical and performance differences among forwards, defensemen, and goalies in elite women's ice hockey.

Christina A Geithner1, Amanda M Lee, Michael R Bracko.   

Abstract

Positional differences have been examined in women's basketball, field hockey, netball, and volleyball, but not in elite women's ice hockey. Our purpose was to describe and compare physical, fitness, and skating performance characteristics of forwards (F), defensemen (D), and goalies (G). Subjects were 112 University of Alberta women players (21.4 +/- 2.9 years of age). A full anthropometric battery was conducted on each player. Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotypes were calculated. Percent body fat (%fat) was estimated from both general and population-specific equations. Subjects performed off-ice fitness tests (vertical jump, 40-yd dash, Leger test for predicting .V(O2)max) and on-ice fitness (Modified 3-Repeat Sprint Skate Test-MRSS, blood lactate after sprint test) and skating performance tests (6.10-m acceleration test, Cornering S-Turn Agility Test). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses of variance were run using SPSS (Version 10.0) for the MacIntosh, with a significance level set a priori at p < 0.05. Significant positional differences were found for bicristal breadths (D > G, F > G); relaxed arm circumference (D > F, G > F); supraspinale and biceps skinfolds (G > D, G > F); and endomorphy (G > F). Significant differences among positions were also found for the MRSS (G > D > F) and agility tests (G > D, G > F). D tended to have the most robust build overall. F were leaner than D and G, and their smaller relaxed arm circumference measurements most likely reflect less subcutaneous fat on the upper arm. F had greater anaerobic power than D, followed by G, and they tended to have greater aerobic capacity. F and D were more agile than G. Performance demands appear to be position specific. F need to be the most versatile and fit because of a greater amount and variety of work performed both during practices and games; their required degrees of versatility and fitness are followed by those required of D and G.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16977704     DOI: 10.1519/17375.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Multi-Stage 20-m Shuttle Run Fitness Test, Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Velocity at Maximal Oxygen Uptake.

Authors:  Giorgos P Paradisis; Elias Zacharogiannis; Dafni Mandila; Athanasia Smirtiotou; Polyxeni Argeitaki; Carlton B Cooke
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  Can Positioning Systems Replace Timing Gates for Measuring Sprint Time in Ice Hockey?

Authors:  Daniel Link; Marcus Weber; Daniel Linke; Martin Lames
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Ball Possession Effectiveness in Men's Elite Floorball According to Quality of Opposition and Game Period.

Authors:  Miguel-Ángel Gómez; Miguel Prieto; Javier Pérez; Jaime Sampaio
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Decision-making and dynamics of eye movements in volleyball experts.

Authors:  Daniel Fortin-Guichard; Vincent Laflamme; Anne-Sophie Julien; Christiane Trottier; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Comparative Study of Two-Minute versus Three-Minute Passive Recovery on Sprint Skating Performance of Ice Hockey Forwards and Defensemen.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Stanula; Subir Gupta; Jakub Baron; Anna Bieniec; Rajmund Tomik; Tomasz Gabrys; Petr Valach; Andrzej Szymon Swinarew
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.