BACKGROUND: Automated virtual microscopy of specimens from gastrointestinal biopsies is based on cytometric parameters of digitized histological sections. To our knowledge, cytometric parameters of gastritis and of adenocarcinoma have yet to be fully characterized. Our objective was to classify gastritis and adenocarcinoma based on cytometric parameters. We hypothesized that automated virtual microscopy using this novel classification can reliably diagnose gastritis and adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Routinely processed hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained histological sections from specimens that showed normal mucosa (14 cases), gastritis (35 cases), and adenocarcinoma (30 cases) diagnosed by conventional optical microscopy were scanned and digitized at high resolution. Thirty-eight cytometric parameters based on density and morphometry were applied to glands and superficial epithelium. Twelve cytometric parameters based on cytologic detail were applied to individual cells. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in cytometric parameters for normal mucosa, gastritis, and adenocarcinoma were found. The most discriminatory parameter was the ratio of the total number of cells to the number of interstitial cells. These differences correctly classified adenocarcinoma at 100% accuracy and overall correctness was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel method of analyzing gastric mucosal histology based on cytometric parameters. Automated virtual microscopy can be used to classify gastric mucosa as normal, gastritis, or adenocarcinoma with reasonable accuracy. Further research is necessary to determine whether automated virtual microscopy can subclassify gastric mucosal histology in greater detail. Copyright 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.
BACKGROUND: Automated virtual microscopy of specimens from gastrointestinal biopsies is based on cytometric parameters of digitized histological sections. To our knowledge, cytometric parameters of gastritis and of adenocarcinoma have yet to be fully characterized. Our objective was to classify gastritis and adenocarcinoma based on cytometric parameters. We hypothesized that automated virtual microscopy using this novel classification can reliably diagnose gastritis and adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Routinely processed hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained histological sections from specimens that showed normal mucosa (14 cases), gastritis (35 cases), and adenocarcinoma (30 cases) diagnosed by conventional optical microscopy were scanned and digitized at high resolution. Thirty-eight cytometric parameters based on density and morphometry were applied to glands and superficial epithelium. Twelve cytometric parameters based on cytologic detail were applied to individual cells. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in cytometric parameters for normal mucosa, gastritis, and adenocarcinoma were found. The most discriminatory parameter was the ratio of the total number of cells to the number of interstitial cells. These differences correctly classified adenocarcinoma at 100% accuracy and overall correctness was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel method of analyzing gastric mucosal histology based on cytometric parameters. Automated virtual microscopy can be used to classify gastric mucosa as normal, gastritis, or adenocarcinoma with reasonable accuracy. Further research is necessary to determine whether automated virtual microscopy can subclassify gastric mucosal histology in greater detail. Copyright 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.