Literature DB >> 16974151

Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea.

Alan Gerard Micco1, Claus-Peter Richter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, cochlear implants bypass normal inner ear function by applying electrical current directly into the cochlea, thereby stimulating cochlear nerve fibers. Stimulating discrete populations of spiral ganglion cells in cochlear implant users' ears is similar to the encoding of small acoustic frequency bands in a normal-hearing person's ear. Thus, spiral ganglion cells stimulated by an electrode convey the information contained by a small acoustic frequency band. Problems that refer to the current spread and subsequent nonselective stimulation of spiral ganglion cells in the cochlea are reviewed. RECENT
FINDINGS: Cochlear anatomy and tissue properties determine the current path in the cochlea. Current spreads largely via scala tympani and across turns. While most of the current leaves the cochlea via the modiolus, the facial canal and the round window constitute additional natural escape paths for the current from the cochlea. Moreover, degenerative processes change tissue resistivities and thus may affect current spread in the cochlea.
SUMMARY: Electrode design and coding strategies may result in more spatial stimulation of spiral ganglion cells, resulting in a better performance of the electrode-tissue interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16974151     DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000244195.04926.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  9 in total

1.  Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements.

Authors:  C-P Richter; S M Rajguru; A I Matic; E L Moreno; A J Fishman; A M Robinson; E Suh; J T Walsh
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Jae-Ik Lee; Richard Seist; Stephen McInturff; Daniel J Lee; M Christian Brown; Konstantina M Stankovic; Shelley Fried
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Quantifying the effects of the electrode-brain interface on the crossing electric currents in deep brain recording and stimulation.

Authors:  N Yousif; R Bayford; S Wang; X Liu
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Implanted devices: the importance of both electrochemical performance and biological acceptance.

Authors:  Ashley N Dalrymple
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.135

5.  Temporal properties of inferior colliculus neurons to photonic stimulation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Xiaodong Tan; Hunter Young; Agnella Izzo Matic; Whitney Zirkle; Suhrud Rajguru; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-08

6.  Comodulation masking release in electric hearing.

Authors:  Robert H Pierzycki; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-11

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design Parameters.

Authors:  Yavuz Nuri Ertas; Derya Ozpolat; Saime Nur Karasu; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.523

8.  Neural Tissue Degeneration in Rosenthal's Canal and Its Impact on Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve by Cochlear Implants: An Image-Based Modeling Study.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Sriperumbudur; Revathi Appali; Anthony W Gummer; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Intra-Cochlear Current Spread Correlates with Speech Perception in Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Charles-Alexandre Joly; Pierre Reynard; Ruben Hermann; Fabien Seldran; Stéphane Gallego; Samar Idriss; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.