Literature DB >> 16973253

Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.

Johannes D Scholtanus1, Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC) class-II restorations over 6 years of clinical service.
METHODS: All class-II GIC restorations made in 1996 and 1997, in regular attending adult patients of a general dental practice were selected. Restorations made for temporary function were excluded, as were those restorations not made using the main study material: Fuji IX GP (GC). Failures were recorded where replacement or repair had occurred. Radiographs were evaluated where available.
RESULTS: The final study group consisted of 116 class-II restorations in 72 patients (33 males, 39 females). Distribution of restorations was: 30 MO, 40 DO, 46 MOD. Until 18 months no failures were observed. From 18 to 42 months survival dropped to 93%. After 42 months failure rate increased and at 72 months survival was only 60%. In all but one case the recorded reason for replacement or repair was gross loss of GIC in proximal areas. No restorations failed because of occlusal wear or isthmus-fractures. On radiographs, progressive loss of GIC material in proximal areas, just below contact areas, was commonly observed. In absence of adjacent teeth no loss of GIC material was observed at proximal surfaces. SIGNIFICANCE: Rising failure rate of class-II high-viscosity GIC restorations, due to proximal breakdown was observed. We hypothesize that caries-like loss of material as seen on radiographs contributes to this phenomenon. Presence of proximal contacts seems to promote disintegration of cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16973253     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  14 in total

1.  Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sema Seval Oztas; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Survival rate of approximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique for glass ionomer insertion.

Authors:  Clarissa Calil Bonifácio; Daniela Hesse; Rachel de Oliveira Rocha; Marcelo Bönecker; Daniela Prócida Raggio; W Evert van Amerongen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Randomized controlled clinical trial of long-term chemo-mechanical caries removal using Papacarie™ gel.

Authors:  Lara Jansiski Motta; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Ana Paula Campanelli; André Luis da Silva; Thays Almeida Alfaya; Camila Haddad Leal de Godoy; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Clinical Performance of Viscous Glass Ionomer Cement in Posterior Cavities over Two Years.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Norbert Krämer
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-02-22

5.  Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial.

Authors:  A Kupietzky; D Atia Joachim; E Tal; M Moskovitz
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-02-28

6.  Clinical study on resin composite and glass ionomer materials in II class restorations in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Piotr Rożniatowski; Emil Korporowicz; Dariusz Gozdowski; Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field.

Authors:  Thomas Klinke; Amro Daboul; Anita Turek; Roland Frankenberger; Reinhard Hickel; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.

Authors:  Hacer Balkaya; Soley Arslan; Kanşad Pala
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Microhardness of glass carbomer and high-viscous glass Ionomer cement in different thickness and thermo-light curing durations after thermocycling aging.

Authors:  Mehmet Buldur; Emine Sirin Karaarslan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  The effect of clinical performance on the survival estimates of direct restorations.

Authors:  Kyou-Li Kim; Cheol Namgung; Byeong-Hoon Cho
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.