Literature DB >> 1697227

ras transfection and expression does not induce progression from tumorigenicity to metastatic ability in mouse LTA cells.

A B Tuck1, S M Wilson, A F Chambers.   

Abstract

Studies testing the ability of a transfected ras oncogene to confer metastatic properties on non-metastatic cells have yielded conflicting results. Most of these studies have used recipient cells at early stages of progression (primary or immortalized, non-tumorigenic lines). In this study we tested the ability of the T24-H-ras oncogene to induce progression of tumorigenic, non-metastatic, murine LTA cells to a metastatic phenotype. Metastatic ability was assessed in complementary assays in two immune-deficient hosts, nude mice (after s.c. injection) and chick embryos (after i.v. injection), to determine if ras transfection affected metastatic properties in hosts lacking an intact immune system. Even with greatly elevated levels of ras p21 protein, pools of ras-transfected cells as well as individual clonal populations remained non-metastatic in both hosts. Serial in vivo passaging did not consistently enhance for either ras expression or metastatic ability. We conclude that expression of an activated ras oncogene in LTA cells does not induce progression from a tumorigenic to a metastatic phenotype. These results are in marked contrast to those obtained for ras expression in most other types. High levels of expression of an activated ras oncogene thus do not always promote progression from tumorigenicity to metastatic ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1697227     DOI: 10.1007/bf00058153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   5.150


  57 in total

1.  Some ras-transformed cells have increased radiosensitivity and decreased repair of sublethal radiation damage.

Authors:  J F Harris; A F Chambers; A S Tam
Journal:  Somat Cell Mol Genet       Date:  1990-01

2.  Expression of H-ras correlates with metastatic potential: evidence for direct regulation of the metastatic phenotype in 10T1/2 and NIH 3T3 cells.

Authors:  S E Egan; G A McClarty; L Jarolim; J A Wright; I Spiro; G Hager; A H Greenberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Genes controlling the metastatic phenotype.

Authors:  M Feldman; L Eisenbach
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1988

Review 4.  Oncogene activation in chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  A Balmain; K Brown
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 5.  Oncogenes and proto-oncogenes: how do they differ?

Authors:  T Hunter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Experimental metastatic ability of H-ras-transformed NIH3T3 cells.

Authors:  G P Bondy; S Wilson; A F Chambers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Coincidental acquisition of growth autonomy and metastatic potential during the malignant transformation of factor-dependent CCL39 lung fibroblasts.

Authors:  D E Chadwick; A E Lagarde
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Genetic suppression of tumor formation: a new frontier in cancer research.

Authors:  R Sager
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Environmental and genetic factors determine the level of NK activity of nude mice and affect their suitability as models for experimental metastasis.

Authors:  N Hanna; T W Davis; I J Fidler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1982-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Selective suppression of metastasis but not tumorigenicity of a mouse lung carcinoma by cell hybridization.

Authors:  M G Layton; L M Franks
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Host genetics and tumour metastasis.

Authors:  K W Hunter
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 7.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.