BACKGROUND: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) has evolved to become a useful non invasive method that can complement other echocardiographic techniques in the assessment of left ventricular function in different clinical conditions. Spectral pulsed TDI can provide measurements of regional systolic and diastolic myocardial velocities and is particularly useful in detecting abnormalities of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. We investigated the presence of systo-diastolic dysfunction in patients (pts) with hypertension compared with pts affected by hypertensive cardiomyopathy and normal control subjects. METHODS: We evaluated 214 pts with traditional echocardiography and TDI: 69 normal control subjects (Group A); 145 pts with hypertension, divided according to base echocardiographic evaluation in 74 with no evidence of hypertensive cardiomyopathy (diastolic dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy, Group B), and 71 with evidence of hypertensive cardiomyopathy (Group C). Pts groups were matched for age, sex, heart rate, smoking status and body surface area. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ventricular diameters, volumes, shortening and ejection fraction values; TDI showed a progressive systolic wave peak reduction from Group A to B and from Group B to C. Routinely Doppler diastolic function did not show any significant difference between Group A and B; TDI showed progressive E wave peak velocity decrease and A wave peak velocity increase from Group A to B and C and from Group B to C. CONCLUSIONS: TDI evaluation showed a ventricular systolic dysfunction in pts with hypertensive cardiomyopathy; in addition, an early mild systo-diastolic dysfunction was detected in subjects with hypertension but no evidence of hypertensive cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) has evolved to become a useful non invasive method that can complement other echocardiographic techniques in the assessment of left ventricular function in different clinical conditions. Spectral pulsed TDI can provide measurements of regional systolic and diastolic myocardial velocities and is particularly useful in detecting abnormalities of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. We investigated the presence of systo-diastolic dysfunction in patients (pts) with hypertension compared with pts affected by hypertensive cardiomyopathy and normal control subjects. METHODS: We evaluated 214 pts with traditional echocardiography and TDI: 69 normal control subjects (Group A); 145 pts with hypertension, divided according to base echocardiographic evaluation in 74 with no evidence of hypertensive cardiomyopathy (diastolic dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy, Group B), and 71 with evidence of hypertensive cardiomyopathy (Group C). Pts groups were matched for age, sex, heart rate, smoking status and body surface area. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ventricular diameters, volumes, shortening and ejection fraction values; TDI showed a progressive systolic wave peak reduction from Group A to B and from Group B to C. Routinely Doppler diastolic function did not show any significant difference between Group A and B; TDI showed progressive E wave peak velocity decrease and A wave peak velocity increase from Group A to B and C and from Group B to C. CONCLUSIONS:TDI evaluation showed a ventricular systolic dysfunction in pts with hypertensive cardiomyopathy; in addition, an early mild systo-diastolic dysfunction was detected in subjects with hypertension but no evidence of hypertensive cardiomyopathy.
Authors: T Oki; T Tabata; Y Mishiro; H Yamada; M Abe; Y Onose; T Wakatsuki; A Iuchi; S Ito Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Dennis A Tighe; Craig S Vinch; Jeffrey C Hill; Theo E Meyer; Robert J Goldberg; Gerard P Aurigemma Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Vitantonio Di Bello; Davide Giorgi; Roberto Pedrinelli; Enrica Talini; Caterina Palagi; Maria Grazia Delle Donne; Giulio Zucchelli; Giulia Dell'omo; Andrea Di Cori; Rita Dell'Anna; Paolo Caravelli; Mario Mariani Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Nikolay P Nikitin; Klaus K A Witte; Simon D R Thackray; Ramesh de Silva; Andrew L Clark; John G F Cleland Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: T Oki; T Tabata; H Yamada; T Wakatsuki; Y Mishiro; M Abe; Y Onose; A Iuchi; S Ito Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: D W Sohn; I H Chai; D J Lee; H C Kim; H S Kim; B H Oh; M M Lee; Y B Park; Y S Choi; J D Seo; Y W Lee Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sanjiv J Shah; Gary L Aistrup; Deepak K Gupta; Matthew J O'Toole; Amanda F Nahhas; Daniel Schuster; Nimi Chirayil; Nikhil Bassi; Satvik Ramakrishna; Lauren Beussink; Sol Misener; Bonnie Kane; David Wang; Blake Randolph; Aiko Ito; Megan Wu; Lisa Akintilo; Thitipong Mongkolrattanothai; Mahendra Reddy; Manvinder Kumar; Rishi Arora; Jason Ng; J Andrew Wasserstrom Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.733