Literature DB >> 16971979

The clinical effect and tolerability of ezetimibe in high-risk patients managed in a specialty cardiovascular risk reduction clinic.

Glen J Pearson1, Gordon A Francis, Jacques S Romney, Dawna M Gilchrist, Andrea Opgenorth, Gabor T Gyenes.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ezetimibe (EZ) is a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor approved for use in Canada. The effect and tolerability of EZ among patients was evaluated in the clinical setting of a specialty cardiovascular risk reduction clinic at the University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta. patients and
METHODS: All patients 18 years of age or older who were prescribed EZ were included, unless they failed to take EZ for a minimum of two weeks, did not have baseline and on-EZ low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, or had concomitant lipid-lowering drugs or dosages changed within one month of starting EZ.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (mean age 57.9 years) were included. By Framingham risk calculation, 71.4% were found to be high-risk patients, 13.1% moderate-risk patients and 15.5% low-risk patients; 66.7% of patients had prior cardiovascular events. On EZ, the mean reductions were: total cholesterol level 1.11 mmol/L (16.5%); LDL-C level 1.01 mmol/L (22.3%); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level 0.06 mmol/L (4.6%); and ratio of total cholesterol level to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level 0.68 mmol/L (12.8%); all were statistically significant (P<0.001). Results were similar when stratified by primary (n=28) versus secondary (n=56) prevention. Patients on EZ monotherapy (n=34) had mean LDL-C reductions of 1.03 mmol/L (20.5%) compared with 1.19 mmol/L (30.1%) or 0.95 mmol/L (22.5%), where EZ was added to low-dose or high-dose statins (P<0.01 for all). On EZ, 30 patients (35.7%) achieved previously unattainable target LDL-C levels. Four patients discontinued the drug due to side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: EZ is safe and effective in high-risk patients treated in the clinical setting of a cardiovascular risk reduction clinic. A mean LDL-C reduction of 1 mmol/L (20% to 30%) in all patient subgroups is consistent with previous clinical trial results. The significant reduction in LDL-C (mean 22.5%) observed in the EZ plus high-dose statin subgroup provides clinical evidence for use of this medication beyond published studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971979      PMCID: PMC2570239          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70313-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  41 in total

1.  Recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of the 2003 update.

Authors:  Jacques Genest; Jiri Frohlich; George Fodor; Ruth McPherson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin compared with atorvastatin in adults with hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Christie M Ballantyne; Michael A Blazing; Thomas R King; William E Brady; Joanne Palmisano
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Effects of ezetimibe, a new cholesterol absorption inhibitor, on plasma lipids in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  R H Knopp; H Gitter; T Truitt; H Bays; C V Manion; L J Lipka; A P LeBeaut; R Suresh; B Yang; E P Veltri
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; C Noel Bairey Merz; H Bryan Brewer; Luther T Clark; Donald B Hunninghake; Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Treatment of high-risk patients with ezetimibe plus simvastatin co-administration versus simvastatin alone to attain National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.

Authors:  Theodore Feldman; Michael Koren; William Insull; James McKenney; Helmut Schrott; Andrew Lewin; Sukrut Shah; Michelle Sidisin; Meehyung Cho; Debra Kush; Yale Mitchel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Christopher P Cannon; Eugene Braunwald; Carolyn H McCabe; Daniel J Rader; Jean L Rouleau; Rene Belder; Steven V Joyal; Karen A Hill; Marc A Pfeffer; Allan M Skene
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Is relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? Findings in 356,222 primary screenees of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT).

Authors:  J Stamler; D Wentworth; J D Neaton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.