PURPOSE: The objective of this project is to simulate the current published topographic indices used for the detection and evaluation of keratoconus to allow their application to maps acquired from multiple topographic machines. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 21 eyes of 14 previously diagnosed keratoconus patients from a single practice using a Tomey TMS-1, an Alcon EyeMap, and a Keratron Topographer. Maps that could not be processed or that contained processing errors were excluded from analysis. Topographic indices native to each of the three devices were recorded from each map. Software was written in ANSI standard C to simulate the indices based on the published formulas and/or descriptions to extend the functionality of The Ohio State University Corneal Topography Tool (OSUCTT), a software package designed to accept the input from many corneal topographic devices and provide consistent display and analysis. Twenty indices were simulated. Linear regression analysis was performed between each simulated index and the corresponding native index. A cross-platform comparison using regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: All simulated indices were significantly correlated with the corresponding native indices (p < 0.01), with a mean R of 0.84, ranging from 0.42 to 0.99. Cross-platform comparisons were nonsignificant for specific indices and devices. CONCLUSION: Topographic indices native to three devices were successfully simulated. Cross-platform comparisons may be limited for specific indices.
PURPOSE: The objective of this project is to simulate the current published topographic indices used for the detection and evaluation of keratoconus to allow their application to maps acquired from multiple topographic machines. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 21 eyes of 14 previously diagnosed keratoconuspatients from a single practice using a Tomey TMS-1, an Alcon EyeMap, and a Keratron Topographer. Maps that could not be processed or that contained processing errors were excluded from analysis. Topographic indices native to each of the three devices were recorded from each map. Software was written in ANSI standard C to simulate the indices based on the published formulas and/or descriptions to extend the functionality of The Ohio State University Corneal Topography Tool (OSUCTT), a software package designed to accept the input from many corneal topographic devices and provide consistent display and analysis. Twenty indices were simulated. Linear regression analysis was performed between each simulated index and the corresponding native index. A cross-platform comparison using regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: All simulated indices were significantly correlated with the corresponding native indices (p < 0.01), with a mean R of 0.84, ranging from 0.42 to 0.99. Cross-platform comparisons were nonsignificant for specific indices and devices. CONCLUSION: Topographic indices native to three devices were successfully simulated. Cross-platform comparisons may be limited for specific indices.
Authors: Ashraf M Mahmoud; Cynthia J Roberts; Richard G Lembach; Michael D Twa; Edward E Herderick; Timothy T McMahon Journal: Cornea Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jason D Marsack; Jos J Rozema; Carina Koppen; Marie-Jose Tassignon; Raymond A Applegate Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.973