Literature DB >> 16971589

Effect of floor space during transport of market-weight pigs on the incidence of transport losses at the packing plant and the relationships between transport conditions and losses.

M J Ritter1, M Ellis, J Brinkmann, J M DeDecker, K K Keffaber, M E Kocher, B A Peterson, J M Schlipf, B F Wolter.   

Abstract

Data on 74 trailer loads of finishing pigs (mean BW = 129.0, SEM = 0.63 kg) from wean-to-finish buildings on 2 farms within 1 production system were collected to investigate the effect of amount of floor space on the trailer (0.39 or 0.48 m2/pig) during transport on the incidence of losses (dead and nonambulatory pigs) at the packing plant and to study the relationships between transport conditions and losses. Pigs were loaded using standard commercial procedures for pig handling and transportation. Two designs of flat-deck trailers with 2 decks were used. Floor space treatments were compared in 2 similarly sized compartments on each deck of each trailer type. Differences in floor space were created by varying the number of pigs in each compartment. The incidence of nonambulatory pigs at the farm during loading and at the plant after unloading, average load weight, load number within each day, event times, and temperature and relative humidity in the trailer from loading to unloading were recorded. Of the 12,511 pigs transported, 0.26% were non-ambulatory at the farm, 0.23% were dead on arrival, and 0.85% were nonambulatory at the plant. Increasing transport floor space from 0.39 to 0.48 m2/pig reduced the percentage of total nonambulatory pigs (0.62 vs. 0.27 +/- 0.13%, respectively; P < 0.05), nonambulatory, noninjured pigs (0.52 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.11%, respectively; P < 0.01), and total losses (dead and nonambulatory pigs) at the plant (0.88 vs. 0.36 +/- 0.16%, respectively; P < 0.05) and tended to reduce dead pigs (0.27 vs. 0.08 +/- 0.08%, respectively; P = 0.06). However, transport floor space did not affect the percentage of nonambulatory, injured pigs at the plant. Nonambulatory pigs at the farm were positively correlated with relative humidity during loading and load number within the day (r = 0.46 and 0.25, respectively; P < 0.05). The percentage of total losses at the plant was positively correlated to waiting time at the plant, unloading time, and total time from loading to unloading (r = 0.24, 0.51, and 0.36, respectively; P < 0.05). Average temperature during loading, waiting at the farm, transport, waiting at the plant, unloading, and average pig weight on the trailer were not correlated to losses. These results suggest that floor space per pig on the trailer and transport conditions can affect transport losses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971589     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality.

Authors:  Luigi Faucitano
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Swine veterinarians are a vital resource for minimizing the incidence of stressed pigs during transport.

Authors:  Gord Doonan; Geneviève Benard; Nicole Cormier
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Relationship between estimated finishing-pig space allowance and in-transit loss in a retrospective survey of 3 packing plants in Ontario in 2003.

Authors:  Charles Haley; Catherine E Dewey; Tina Widowski; Robert Friendship
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs1.

Authors:  Tiago L Passafaro; Denise Van de Stroet; Nora M Bello; Noel H Williams; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Loading and Unloading Finishing Pigs: Effects of Bedding Types, Ramp Angle, and Bedding Moisture.

Authors:  Arlene Garcia; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Effects of Transport at Weaning on the Behavior, Physiology and Performance of Pigs.

Authors:  Mhairi A Sutherland; Brittany L Backus; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Loading and Unloading Weaned Pigs: Effects of Bedding Types, Ramp Angle, and Bedding Moisture.

Authors:  Arlene Garcia; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Establishing Sprinkling Requirements on Trailers Transporting Market Weight Pigs in Warm and Hot Weather.

Authors:  Rebecca Kephart; Anna Johnson; Avi Sapkota; Kenneth Stalder; John McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Establishing Bedding Requirements on Trailers Transporting Market Weight Pigs in Warm Weather.

Authors:  Rebecca Kephart; Anna Johnson; Avi Sapkota; Kenneth Stalder; John McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Effect of Season, Transport Length, Deck Location, and Lairage Length on Pork Quality and Blood Cortisol Concentrations of Market Hogs.

Authors:  David Newman; Jennifer Young; Chad Carr; Matt Ryan; Eric Berg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.