Literature DB >> 16970579

Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care.

D H Jakobsen1, E Sonne, J Andreasen, H Kehlet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare convalescence after colonic surgery with a fast-track rehabilitation programme vs conventional care.
BACKGROUND: Introduction of a multimodal rehabilitation programme (fast-track) with focus on epidural anaesthesia, minimal invasive surgical techniques, optimal pain control, and early nutrition and mobilization together with detailed patient information have led to a shorter hospital stay after colonic surgery. There are not much data on convalescence after discharge.
METHODS: A prospective, controlled, non-randomized interview-based assessment in 160 patients undergoing an elective, uncomplicated, open colonic resection or the Hartmann reversal procedure with a fast-track or a conventional care programme in two university hospitals. A structured interview-based assessment was performed preoperatively, and day 14 and 30 postoperatively.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing colonic surgery with a fast-track programme regained functional capabilities earlier with less fatigue and need for sleep compared with patients having conventional care. Despite early discharge of the fast-track patients (mean 3.4 days vs 7.5 days), no differences were found according to the need for home care, social care and visit to general practitioners, although the fast-track group had an increased number of visits at the outpatient clinic for wound care. More patients in the fast-track group were re-admitted, but the overall mean total hospital stay was 4.2 days vs 8.3 days in the conventional group.
CONCLUSION: A fast-track rehabillitation programme led to a shorter hospital stay, less fatigue and earlier resumption of normal activities, without the increased need for support after discharge compared with conventionally treated patients after uncomplicated colonic resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16970579     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00995.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  30 in total

Review 1.  Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand?

Authors:  Lidewij Spelt; Daniel Ansari; Christian Sturesson; Bobby Tingstedt; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Future perspectives and research initiatives in fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Is gum chewing useful for ileus after elective colorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenceslao Vásquez; Adrián V Hernández; Jose Luis Garcia-Sabrido
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Postoperative fatigue: a review.

Authors:  Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Dexiang Zhu; Li Liang; Lechi Ye; Qi Lin; Yunshi Zhong; Ye Wei; Li Ren; Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care.

Authors:  J Hardt; M Schwarzbach; T Hasenberg; S Post; P Kienle; U Ronellenfitsch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery Dissemination in Michigan Hospitals.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; John D Syrjamaki; Edward C Norton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.