OBJECTIVE: Acupuncture has become an important provider-based complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatment. To improve understanding of its role in personal health care, an analysis of national data was conducted to examine user sociodemographics, conditions treated, and the relationship of use with conventional Western medical care. DESIGN: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), conducted in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one-thousand and forty-four (31,044) adults who completed the NHIS Sample Adult Core. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was recent use of acupuncture, defined as use within the previous 12 months. RESULTS: In the 2002 NHIS sample, 4.1% of the respondents reported lifetime use, and 1.1% (representing 2.13 million Americans) reported recent use of acupuncture. Recent use (n = 327) was positively associated with being an Asian female, living in the West or Northeast, having poorer self-reported health status, a higher level of education, and being an ex-smoker. Among recent users, the most typical treatment regimen was two to four treatments (34.5%), with musculoskeletal complaints being the most frequently reported conditions, led by back pain (34.0%). Reports of perceived benefit were generally high. Respondents indicated that acupuncture was used both as an alternative and as a complementary therapy. A reasonable number also reported being referred to acupuncture by a conventional medical professional (25.3%). The cross-sectional nature of the data precluded analysis of transitions in health care use (between conventional and CAM treatments) over time. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of acupuncture was somewhat lower than expected given its significant national and international recognition and its visibility in the media. This may in part be a function of provider availability and cultural factors.
OBJECTIVE: Acupuncture has become an important provider-based complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatment. To improve understanding of its role in personal health care, an analysis of national data was conducted to examine user sociodemographics, conditions treated, and the relationship of use with conventional Western medical care. DESIGN: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), conducted in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one-thousand and forty-four (31,044) adults who completed the NHIS Sample Adult Core. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was recent use of acupuncture, defined as use within the previous 12 months. RESULTS: In the 2002 NHIS sample, 4.1% of the respondents reported lifetime use, and 1.1% (representing 2.13 million Americans) reported recent use of acupuncture. Recent use (n = 327) was positively associated with being an Asian female, living in the West or Northeast, having poorer self-reported health status, a higher level of education, and being an ex-smoker. Among recent users, the most typical treatment regimen was two to four treatments (34.5%), with musculoskeletal complaints being the most frequently reported conditions, led by back pain (34.0%). Reports of perceived benefit were generally high. Respondents indicated that acupuncture was used both as an alternative and as a complementary therapy. A reasonable number also reported being referred to acupuncture by a conventional medical professional (25.3%). The cross-sectional nature of the data precluded analysis of transitions in health care use (between conventional and CAM treatments) over time. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of acupuncture was somewhat lower than expected given its significant national and international recognition and its visibility in the media. This may in part be a function of provider availability and cultural factors.
Authors: Ellen Silver Highfield; Lisa Spellman; Linda L Barnes; Ted J Kaptchuk; Gabrielle Paradis; Lisa Ann Conboy; Robert Saper Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: Yuan Yuan; Zhaolei Jiang; Ye Zhao; Wei-Chung Tsai; Jheel Patel; Lan S Chen; Changyu Shen; Shien-Fong Lin; Huei-Sheng Vincent Chen; Thomas H Everett; Michael C Fishbein; Zhenhui Chen; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Klaus Linde; Gianni Allais; Benno Brinkhaus; Yutong Fei; Michael Mehring; Emily A Vertosick; Andrew Vickers; Adrian R White Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-06-28
Authors: Eric Manheimer; Susan Wieland; Elizabeth Kimbrough; Ker Cheng; Brian M Berman Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Jongbae Park; Klaus Linde; Eric Manheimer; Albrecht Molsberger; Karen Sherman; Caroline Smith; Joseph Sung; Andrew Vickers; Rosa Schnyer Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.579