Literature DB >> 16970116

[Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period].

Roger Lara Ricalde1, Gerardo Menocal Tobías, Carlos Ramos Pérez, Norma Velázquez Ramírez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 compared with the TCu 380A inserted in the postpartum period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized comparative study carried out in the National Perinatology Institute, intrauterine devices MLCu 375 and Tcu 380A were inserted to 157 patients who voluntary accepted, and previously signed informed consent. There were four instances for the intrauterine devices insertion: within 10 minutes after vaginal delivery, during cesarean section (immediate postplacental insertion) and postpartum-postcesarean insertion (in the time range of 10 min to 48 h). All insertions were made with ring forceps. From 1 h to 24 h later, abdominal ultrasound examinations were performed to assess the distances between the upper part of the device to the fundus of uterine cavity. Follow up visits were scheduled at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Net cumulative life table event rates of discontinuations were estimated at one year.
RESULTS: The expulsion rates were 10.4 for the MLCu 375 and 7.7 for the TCu 380A and they were not influenced by the moment of the intrauterine device insertion, not by the cervical dilatation, neither by the distance of the intrauterine device to the fundus of uterine cavity. The removal rates for bleeding and pain were 4.9 and 4.8, the removal rates for non medical reasons were 3.7 and 4.9 respectively. There was one case of genital infection in the MLCu 375 group. There were no pregnancies, nor uterine perforation. The one year continuation rates were 77.1 and 82.6 respectively. There were no statistical significant differences in the comparative rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The intrauterine device MLCu 375 is as safe and effective as the TCu380A when they are inserted in the postpartum period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16970116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ginecol Obstet Mex        ISSN: 0300-9041


  6 in total

1.  Continuation of Copper T in Immediate Postplacental, Immediate Postabortal and Interval Period of Insertion.

Authors:  Banashree Nath; Harsha S Gaikwad; Kashika Nagpal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-05-28

2.  Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Tod Aeby
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 3.  Priority strategies for India's family planning programme.

Authors:  Saroj Pachauri
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Single center experience on implementation of the postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study.

Authors:  D L W Dasanayake; M Patabendige; Y Amarasinghe
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-04-10

5.  Immediate postplacental insertion of a copper intrauterine device: a pilot study to evaluate expulsion rate by mode of delivery.

Authors:  Ayhan Sucak; Sarp Ozcan; Şevki Çelen; Turhan Çağlar; Gonca Göksu; Nuri Danışman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The relationship of age and place of delivery with postpartum contraception prior to discharge in Mexico: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Blair G Darney; Sandra G Sosa-Rubi; Edson Servan-Mori; Maria I Rodriguez; Dilys Walker; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.