AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE, also known as AGE-specific receptor [AGER]) has been implicated in the development of diabetic vascular complications. Blockade of RAGE using a soluble form of the receptor (sRAGE) suppressed vascular hyperpermeability and atherosclerosis in animal models. Since little is known about the regulation of endogenous sRAGE levels, we determined whether serum sRAGE is influenced by circulating AGEs and the severity of nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 150 healthy control and 318 diabetic subjects. Diabetic subjects were subdivided into those with proteinuria, microalbuminuria or normoalbuminuria. Serum sRAGE was assayed by ELISA and serum AGEs by competitive ELISA using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against AGE-RNase. RESULTS: Diabetic subjects had higher sRAGE (1,029.5 pg/ml [766.1-1,423.0] interquartile range vs 1,002.6 [726.5-1,345.3], p<0.05) and AGEs (4.07+/-1.13, SD, unit/ml vs 3.39+/-1.05, p<0.01) than controls. Proteinuric subjects had the highest sRAGE levels and there was a significant trend between the severity of nephropathy and sRAGE (p=0.01). In diabetic subjects, serum log(sRAGE) correlated with AGEs (r=0.27, p<0.001), log(plasma creatinine) (r=0.31, p<0.001), log(urine AER) (r=0.24, p<0.01) and log(triglycerides) (r=0.15, p<0.01). On stepwise linear regression analysis, AGEs and creatinine levels were the main independent determinants of sRAGE concentration. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Serum sRAGE levels and circulating AGEs are associated with the severity of nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Prospective studies are required to determine whether endogenous sRAGE potentially influences the development of diabetic vascular complications.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE, also known as AGE-specific receptor [AGER]) has been implicated in the development of diabetic vascular complications. Blockade of RAGE using a soluble form of the receptor (sRAGE) suppressed vascular hyperpermeability and atherosclerosis in animal models. Since little is known about the regulation of endogenous sRAGE levels, we determined whether serum sRAGE is influenced by circulating AGEs and the severity of nephropathy in type 2 diabeticpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 150 healthy control and 318 diabetic subjects. Diabetic subjects were subdivided into those with proteinuria, microalbuminuria or normoalbuminuria. Serum sRAGE was assayed by ELISA and serum AGEs by competitive ELISA using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against AGE-RNase. RESULTS:Diabetic subjects had higher sRAGE (1,029.5 pg/ml [766.1-1,423.0] interquartile range vs 1,002.6 [726.5-1,345.3], p<0.05) and AGEs (4.07+/-1.13, SD, unit/ml vs 3.39+/-1.05, p<0.01) than controls. Proteinuric subjects had the highest sRAGE levels and there was a significant trend between the severity of nephropathy and sRAGE (p=0.01). In diabetic subjects, serum log(sRAGE) correlated with AGEs (r=0.27, p<0.001), log(plasma creatinine) (r=0.31, p<0.001), log(urine AER) (r=0.24, p<0.01) and log(triglycerides) (r=0.15, p<0.01). On stepwise linear regression analysis, AGEs and creatinine levels were the main independent determinants of sRAGE concentration. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Serum sRAGE levels and circulating AGEs are associated with the severity of nephropathy in type 2 diabeticpatients. Prospective studies are required to determine whether endogenous sRAGE potentially influences the development of diabetic vascular complications.
Authors: A W Stitt; C He; S Friedman; L Scher; P Rossi; L Ong; H Founds; Y M Li; R Bucala; H Vlassara Journal: Mol Med Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Kathryn C B Tan; Wing-Sun Chow; Victor H G Ai; Christine Metz; Richard Bucala; Karen S L Lam Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J Brett; A M Schmidt; S D Yan; Y S Zou; E Weidman; D Pinsky; R Nowygrod; M Neeper; C Przysiecki; A Shaw Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: M T Goova; J Li; T Kislinger; W Qu; Y Lu; L G Bucciarelli; S Nowygrod; B M Wolf; X Caliste; S F Yan; D M Stern; A M Schmidt Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Lana E Hanford; Jan J Enghild; Zuzana Valnickova; Steen V Petersen; Lisa M Schaefer; Todd M Schaefer; Todd A Reinhart; Tim D Oury Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-09-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: U Ritthaler; Y Deng; Y Zhang; J Greten; M Abel; B Sido; J Allenberg; G Otto; H Roth; A Bierhaus Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Harin Rhee; Sang Heon Song; Ihm Soo Kwak; Il Young Kim; Eun Young Seong; Dong Won Lee; Soo Bong Lee Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.801
Authors: Tina E Brinkley; Xiaoyan Leng; Barbara J Nicklas; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Jingzhong Ding; Dalane W Kitzman; W Gregory Hundley Journal: Metabolism Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: S Charalampidou; Μ Simitsopoulou; L Skoura; K Tziomalos; V Koulourida; D G Goulis Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2017 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Richard D Semba; Luigi Ferrucci; Kai Sun; Justine Beck; Mansi Dalal; Ravi Varadhan; Jeremy Walston; Jack M Guralnik; Linda P Fried Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: J W M Nin; I Ferreira; C G Schalkwijk; M H Prins; N Chaturvedi; J H Fuller; C D A Stehouwer Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Marcus Baumann; Tom Richart; Daniel Sollinger; Jaroslav Pelisek; Marcel Roos; Tatiana Kouznetsova; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Uwe Heemann; Jan A Staessen Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 9.951