Literature DB >> 16969118

Treatment strategies for skeletal complications of cancer.

James R Berenson1, Lakshmi Rajdev, Michael Broder.   

Abstract

Skeletal complications are a common result of many cancers, particularly of multiple myeloma and bone metastases of solid tumors originating in the breast, prostate or lung. A number of treatment options are available, including radiotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, surgery and chemotherapy. Recently, bisphosphonates have emerged as a promising new treatment option for bone complications of cancer. These agents are potent inhibitors of osteoclast activity that bind to the bone matrix, are released during bone resorption, and are subsequently internalized by osteoclasts, where they interfere with biochemical pathways and induce osteoclast apoptosis. Bisphosphonates also antagonize osteoclastogenesis and promote the differentiation of osteoblasts. As a result, bisphosphonates inhibit tumor-induced osteolysis and reduce skeletal morbidity. Bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated, although they have recently been associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw, a painful and debilitating side effect that is only beginning to be understood. Despite this concern, bisphosphonates are an important tool in the management of skeletal complications of cancer, providing benefits for the treatment of hypercalcemia, osteolytic lesions and fractures, as well as offering amelioration of pain and improvement in quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16969118     DOI: 10.4161/cbt.5.9.3305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  7 in total

Review 1.  Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonates in cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Cesar A Migliorati; Joel B Epstein; Elliot Abt; James R Berenson
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction in cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  T Hasegawa; S Hayashida; E Kondo; Y Takeda; H Miyamoto; Y Kawaoka; N Ueda; E Iwata; H Nakahara; M Kobayashi; S Soutome; S I Yamada; I Tojyo; Y Kojima; M Umeda; S Fujita; H Kurita; Y Shibuya; T Kirita; T Komori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Does inflammatory dental disease affect the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients using high-dose bone-modifying agents?

Authors:  Nobuhiro Ueda; Chie Nakashima; Kumiko Aoki; Hiroko Shimotsuji; Kazuhiko Nakaue; Hajime Yoshioka; Satoshi Kurokawa; Yuichiro Imai; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction and the effects of a short drug holiday in cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  T Hasegawa; N Ueda; S I Yamada; S Kato; E Iwata; S Hayashida; Y Kojima; M Shinohara; I Tojo; H Nakahara; T Yamaguchi; T Kirita; H Kurita; Y Shibuya; S Soutome; M Akashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Minimizing MRONJ after Tooth Extraction in Cancer Patients Receiving Bone-Modifying Agents.

Authors:  Gal Avishai; Daniel Muchnik; Daya Masri; Ayelet Zlotogorski-Hurvitz; Liat Chaushu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Bisphosphonates in oncology: evidence for the prevention of skeletal events in patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 7.  Targeted Nanomedicine to Treat Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Isaac M Adjei; Madison N Temples; Shannon B Brown; Blanka Sharma
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.