Literature DB >> 16968638

Worldsid assessment of far side impact countermeasures.

Frank A Pintar1, Narayan Yoganandan, Brian D Stemper, Ola Bostrom, Stephen W Rouhana, Stuart Smith, Laurie Sparke, Brian N Fildes, Kennerly H Digges.   

Abstract

Far side impact trauma has been demonstrated as a significant portion of the total trauma in side impacts. The objective of the study was to assess the potential usefulness of countermeasures and assess the trade-offs associated with generic countermeasure design. Because the WorldSID dummy has demonstrated promise as a potential far side impact dummy, it was chosen to assess countermeasures in this mode. A unique far side impact buck was designed for a sled test system that included, as a standard configuration, a center console and outboard three-point belt system. This configuration assumed a left side driver with a right side impact. The buck allowed for additional options of generic restraints including shoulder or thorax plates or an inboard shoulder belt. The entire buck could be mounted on the sled in either a 90-degree (3-o'clock PDOF) or a 60-degree (2-o'clock PDOF) orientation. A total of 19 WorldSID tests were completed. The inboard shoulder belt configuration produced high shear forces in the lower neck (2430 N) when the belt position was placed over the mid portion of the neck. Shear forces were reduced and of opposite sign when the inboard belt position was horizontal and over the shoulder; forces were similar to the standard outboard belt configuration (830 - 1100 N). A shoulder or thorax restraint was effective in limiting the head excursion, but each caused significant displacement at the corresponding region on the dummy. A shoulder restraint resulted in shoulder displacements of 30 - 43 mm. A thorax restraint caused thorax deflections of 39 - 64 mm. Inboard restraints for far side impacts can be effective in reducing head excursion but the specific design and placement of these restraints determine their overall injury mitigating characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16968638      PMCID: PMC3217486     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med        ISSN: 1540-0360


  5 in total

1.  Patterns of abdominal injuries in frontal and side impacts.

Authors:  N Yoganandan; F A Pintar; T A Gennarelli; M R Maltese
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2000

2.  Injuries to restrained occupants in far-side crashes.

Authors:  J Augenstein; E Perdeck; P Martin; J Bowen; J Stratton; T Horton; M Singer; K Digges; J Steps
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2000

3.  Characteristics of the injury environment in far-side crashes.

Authors:  K Digges; H Gabler; P Mohan; B Alonso
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2005

4.  Lower extremity injuries in lateral impact: a retrospective study.

Authors:  R F Banglmaier; S W Rouhana; P Beillas; K H Yang
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2003

5.  Aortic injuries in side impacts: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Melanie Franklyn; Michael Fitzharris; King Yang; Richard Frampton; Andrew Morris; Brian Fildes
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2002
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing occupant-to-seat belt interaction in far-side crashes.

Authors:  C A Douglas; B N Fildes; T J Gibson; O Boström; F A Pintar
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2007

2.  Crash characteristics and injury patterns of restrained front seat occupants in far-side impacts.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Mike W J Arun; Dale E Halloway; Frank A Pintar; Dennis J Maiman; Aniko Szabo; Rodney W Rudd
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.491

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.