Literature DB >> 16968630

The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates: the influence of vehicle type, stiffness, and impact mode.

P Niehoff1, H C Gabler.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates as a function of crash mode, vehicle body type, and vehicle stiffness. The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates was evaluated for 121 NASS/CDS 2000-2003 cases for which direct measurements of delta-V had been retrieved from an Event Data Recorder on the case vehicle. WinSmash was found to underestimate delta-V by 23% on average. WinSmash was found to be most accurate in crashes involving full frontal engagement of the vehicle structure. When using categorical stiffness coefficients, the accuracy of delta-V estimates was found to be a strong function of vehicle type. WinSmash underestimated delta-V for pickup trucks by only 3%, but underestimated delta-V for front-wheel drive cars by 31%. The use of vehicle-specific stiffness coefficients improved the accuracy of the longitudinal delta-V estimate. The single most important factor in improving WinSmash accuracy was the inclusion of restitution. After adjusting for restitution, WinSmash underestimated delta-V in frontal crashes by only 1% on average.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16968630      PMCID: PMC3217484     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med        ISSN: 1540-0360


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of NASS/CDS Delta-V Estimates from the Enhanced WinSmash Algorithm.

Authors:  Carolyn E Hampton; Hampton C Gabler
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2010

2.  Injury mechanisms and severity in narrow offset frontal impacts.

Authors:  Frank A Pintar; Narayan Yoganandan; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10

3.  EMS Provider assessment of vehicle damage compared with assessment by a professional crash reconstructionist.

Authors:  E Brooke Lerner; Jeremy T Cushman; Alan Blatt; Richard D Lawrence; Manish N Shah; Robert A Swor; Karen Brasel; Gregory J Jurkovich
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Evaluation of chest injury mechanisms in nearside oblique frontal impacts.

Authors:  Johan Iraeus; Mats Lindquist; Sofie Wistrand; Elin Sibgård; Bengt Pipkorn
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2013

5.  NASS/CDS delta-V estimates: the influence of enhancements to the WinSmash crash reconstruction code.

Authors:  Carolyn E Hampton; Hampton C Gabler
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2009-10

6.  Impact and injury patterns in between-rails frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection.

Authors:  Richard M Morgan; Chongzhen Cui; Kennerly H Digges; Libo Cao; Cing-Dao Steve Kan
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2012

7.  A reexamination of the small overlap frontal crash.

Authors:  Paul Scullion; Richard M Morgan; Pradeep Mohan; Cing-Dao Kan; Kurt Shanks; Wook Jin; Ravi Tangirala
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2010

8.  Injury differences between small and large overlap frontal crashes.

Authors:  Jason J Hallman; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

9.  Splenic trauma as an adverse effect of torso-protecting side airbags: biomechanical and case evidence.

Authors:  Jason J Hallman; Karen J Brasel; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2009-10

10.  Minor crashes and 'whiplash' in the United States.

Authors:  Adam J Bartsch; Lars G Gilbertson; Vikas Prakash; Douglas R Morr; John F Wiechel
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.