AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the most effective tools for the assessment and diagnosis of sleep problems, as well as identify the most effective strategies for the promotion of sleep within this population. BACKGROUND: Experiencing reduced sleep quality is often associated with normal ageing, however this may be exacerbated for residents of aged care facilities. External factors such as noise, light and night-time nursing may impact negatively upon sleeping patterns. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases and the reference lists and bibliographies of included studies were searched. Papers were grouped according to type of intervention or assessment tool and presented in a narrative summary. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified many interventions to promote sleep. Multidisciplinary strategies such as combining a reduction in environmental noise, reduction of night-time nursing care and promotion of daytime activity, are likely to be most effective for promoting sleep in the population of interest. The use of sedating medications is cautioned, as their long-term efficacy in promoting sleep is questionable. Wrist actigraphy was found to be the most accurate objective sleep assessment tool. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lack of sleep, disturbed sleep and the overuse of medications especially sedations reduce the quality of life for older people. Effective, safe sleep interventions should be promoted and practised by nurses.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the most effective tools for the assessment and diagnosis of sleep problems, as well as identify the most effective strategies for the promotion of sleep within this population. BACKGROUND: Experiencing reduced sleep quality is often associated with normal ageing, however this may be exacerbated for residents of aged care facilities. External factors such as noise, light and night-time nursing may impact negatively upon sleeping patterns. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases and the reference lists and bibliographies of included studies were searched. Papers were grouped according to type of intervention or assessment tool and presented in a narrative summary. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified many interventions to promote sleep. Multidisciplinary strategies such as combining a reduction in environmental noise, reduction of night-time nursing care and promotion of daytime activity, are likely to be most effective for promoting sleep in the population of interest. The use of sedating medications is cautioned, as their long-term efficacy in promoting sleep is questionable. Wrist actigraphy was found to be the most accurate objective sleep assessment tool. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lack of sleep, disturbed sleep and the overuse of medications especially sedations reduce the quality of life for older people. Effective, safe sleep interventions should be promoted and practised by nurses.
Authors: Kathy C Richards; Corinne Lambert; Cornelia K Beck; Donald L Bliwise; William J Evans; Gurpreet K Kalra; Morton H Kleban; Rebecca Lorenz; Karen Rose; Nalaka S Gooneratne; Dennis H Sullivan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Karina W Davidson; Jonathan Shaffer; Siqin Ye; Louise Falzon; Iheanacho O Emeruwa; Kevin Sundquist; Ifeoma A Inneh; Susan L Mascitelli; Wilhelmina M Manzano; David K Vawdrey; Henry H Ting Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Harrison G Bloom; Imran Ahmed; Cathy A Alessi; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Daniel J Buysse; Meir H Kryger; Barbara A Phillips; Michael J Thorpy; Michael V Vitiello; Phyllis C Zee Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.562