Literature DB >> 16968315

Reducing the risk of peripherally inserted central catheter line complications in the oncology setting.

Y-S Yap1, C Karapetis, S Lerose, S Iyer, B Koczwara.   

Abstract

At our institution, a retrospective review of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in oncology patients had previously demonstrated a complication rate of 40.7%. Since then we have implemented strategies to reduce complications including staff and patient education, insertion technique modification and PICC maintenance utilizing a PICC nurse. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the recent PICC complication rate and to compare it with the previously reported findings. Prospectively collected PICC complication data and medical records from all patients with solid tumours who had PICCs inserted in 2003 were analysed. A historical cohort comparative analysis was performed using our PICC complication rate from 2000 to 2001. Eighty-eight PICC lines were inserted in 73 patients under radiological guidance. The median PICC dwell time was 44 days (1-524 days). The overall complication rate was 15.9% (14/88) or 2.0 complications per 1,000 PICC-days. Infections developed in 5.7% (5/88) and thrombotic events occurred in 4.5% (4 /88) of PICCs. The mean time to complication was 45 days. The complication rate for 2003 was significantly lower than the rate for 2001 (P = 0.006), especially of infective complications (P = 0.004). Strategies introduced to reduce PICC complications may have been the reason for this improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16968315     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00664.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  22 in total

1.  Port catheter versus peripherally inserted central catheter for postoperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 448 patients.

Authors:  L Lefebvre; E Noyon; D Georgescu; V Proust; C Alexandru; M Leheurteur; J C Thery; L Savary; O Rigal; F Di Fiore; C Veyret; F Clatot
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.

Authors:  G S Patel; K Jain; R Kumar; A H Strickland; L Pellegrini; J Slavotinek; M Eaton; W McLeay; T Price; M Ly; S Ullah; B Koczwara; G Kichenadasse; C S Karapetis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  An evaluation of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for children with cancer requiring long-term venous access.

Authors:  Naoki Hatakeyama; Tsukasa Hori; Masaki Yamamoto; Nobuo Mizue; Natsuko Inazawa; Keita Igarashi; Hiroyuki Tsutsumi; Nobuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?

Authors:  Tian-Tian Tang; Lei Liu; Chun-Xiao Li; Yun-Tao Li; Tao Zhou; Hai-Ping Li; Jianxin Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Efficacy of multifaceted interventions in reducing complications of peripherally inserted central catheter in adult oncology patients.

Authors:  Geng Tian; Yan Zhu; Li Qi; Fengqin Guo; Haidan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction of peripherally inserted central catheters in terminally ill cancer patients: a prospective multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Kwonoh Park; Hyun Jung Jun; So Yeon Oh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Computer identification of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted venous catheters.

Authors:  R Scott Evans; Lorraine H Linford; Jamie H Sharp; Gayle White; James F Lloyd; Lindell K Weaver
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

8.  Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Silvia Bellesi; Patrizia Chiusolo; Gennaro De Pascale; Mauro Pittiruti; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo; Elisabetta Metafuni; Sabrina Giammarco; Federica Sorà; Luca Laurenti; Giuseppe Leone; Simona Sica
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  A Randomized Trial of Central Venous Catheter Type and Thrombosis in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fletcher; Thomas J Wilson; Venkatakrishna Rajajee; William R Stetler; Teresa L Jacobs; Kyle M Sheehan; Devin L Brown
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line in Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Sulav Sapkota; Raju Sannur; Radheshyam Naik
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.