Literature DB >> 16967399

The effect of intermittent nasogastric feeding on preventing aspiration pneumonia in ventilated critically ill patients.

Yu-Chih Chen1, Shin-Shang Chou, Li-Hwa Lin, Li-Fen Wu.   

Abstract

This randomized, controlled study employed two feeding protocols for 107 participants in two intensive care units (ICUs) of a medical center to investigate the efficacy of intermittent nasogastric (NG) feeding in preventing aspiration pneumonia in critically ill patients on ventilators. The participants were randomly assigned to receive continuous (51 patients) or intermittent (56 patients) feeding. The primary outcomes, including gastric emptiness index and pulmonary aspiration index, were examined on Day 0 and Day 7 of the intervention. In addition, patients were followed up to the 21st day to evaluate the secondary outcomes, which included length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and airway status. The results showed that the patients in the intermittent feeding group had a higher total intake volume at Day 7 (p = .000), had been extubated earlier at Day 21 (p = .002), and had a lower risk of aspiration pneumonia (odds ratios: 0.146, 95% CI = 0.062-0.413, p = .000) than the patients in the control group. Participants being treated with a high dose of dopamine were 2.95 times more likely to get aspiration pneumonia than those receiving a low dose of dopamine (95 % CI = 1.076-8.107, p = .035). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups'; LOS. The results of this study provide evidence that clinical caregivers may use to make better decisions in terms of feeding methods for critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16967399     DOI: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387575.66598.2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Res        ISSN: 1682-3141            Impact factor:   1.682


  6 in total

1.  Effect of different feeding methods on gastrointestinal function in critical patients (DFM-GFC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Aijing Deng; Bojun Zheng; Jian Li; Yi Yu; Honglian Ouyang; Xin Huang; Hong Chen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Enteral nutritional intake in adult korean intensive care patients.

Authors:  Hyunjung Kim; Nancy A Stotts; Erika S Froelicher; Marguerite M Engler; Carol Porter
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 3.  Time-restricted feeding and the realignment of biological rhythms: translational opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Jag Sunderram; Stavroula Sofou; Kubra Kamisoglu; Vassiliki Karantza; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  Lower versus higher dose of enteral caloric intake in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hasan M Al-Dorzi; Abdullah Albarrak; Mazen Ferwana; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Yaseen M Arabi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Comparison of Intermittent and Bolus Enteral Feeding Methods on Enteral Feeding Intolerance of Patients with Sepsis: A Triple-blind Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Morteza Nasiri; Zahra Farsi; Mojtaba Ahangari; Fahimeh Dadgari
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  Circadian Disruption in Critical Illness.

Authors:  Aesha M Jobanputra; Matthew T Scharf; Ioannis P Androulakis; Jag Sunderram
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.