PURPOSE: ABT-751 is an orally active antimitotic agent that is currently in Phase II clinical trials. This agent binds to the colchicine site on ss-tubulin and inhibits polymerization of microtubules. This disruption of microtubule dynamics leads to a block in the cell cycle at the G2/M phase, and promotes apoptosis. ABT-751, as a single agent, has antitumor activity against a series of xenograft models including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer. The current studies were conducted to determine whether ABT-751 enhances antitumor activity of standard cytotoxic therapies currently in clinical use. METHODS: Efficacy of ABT-751, in combination with cisplatin, 5-FU, and radiation, was evaluated in the Calu-6 NSCLC, HT-29 colon, and HCT-116 colon carcinoma xenograft models, respectively. Tumor-bearing athymic mice were treated with ABT-751 orally once a day at 75 or 100 mg/kg/day on a 5-days-on, 5-days-off schedule for two cycles. RESULTS: Efficacy of ABT-751 at 100 mg/kg/day was tested in combination with cisplatin at its maximum tolerable dose (MTD) (10 mg/kg/day, i.p. x1) in Calu-6 tumor-bearing athymic mice. The percent treated/control (%T/C) tumor volume ratios on day 38 were 35, 37, and 6, and the percent tumor growth delay (%TGD) values were 71, 65, and 188 for cisplatin, ABT-751 and the combination groups, respectively. HT-29 colon tumors were used to test ABT-751 in combination with an MTD of 5-FU, 30 mg/kg/day, i.p., q.d. x5. The %T/C ratios on day 38 were 22, 28, and 5 and the %TGD values were 75, 75, and 150 for 5-FU, ABT-751, and the combination groups, respectively. Treatment of HCT-116 colon carcinoma tumors with ABT-751, concurrent with the radiation treatment, was able to both enhance radiation-induced tumor regression, and delay the time to recurrence and progression. Growth curves allowed calculation of enhancement of radiation-induced growth delay (defined as the additional time required for a treated tumor to reach four times its original size) of 2, 9, and 12 days, for ABT-751 alone, radiation alone, and the combination, respectively. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these studies demonstrate that ABT-751 enhanced efficacy of standard cytotoxic therapies in a variety of tumor xenograft models, and that enhancement was at least additive in all systems.
PURPOSE:ABT-751 is an orally active antimitotic agent that is currently in Phase II clinical trials. This agent binds to the colchicine site on ss-tubulin and inhibits polymerization of microtubules. This disruption of microtubule dynamics leads to a block in the cell cycle at the G2/M phase, and promotes apoptosis. ABT-751, as a single agent, has antitumor activity against a series of xenograft models including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer. The current studies were conducted to determine whether ABT-751 enhances antitumor activity of standard cytotoxic therapies currently in clinical use. METHODS: Efficacy of ABT-751, in combination with cisplatin, 5-FU, and radiation, was evaluated in the Calu-6 NSCLC, HT-29 colon, and HCT-116 colon carcinoma xenograft models, respectively. Tumor-bearing athymic mice were treated with ABT-751 orally once a day at 75 or 100 mg/kg/day on a 5-days-on, 5-days-off schedule for two cycles. RESULTS: Efficacy of ABT-751 at 100 mg/kg/day was tested in combination with cisplatin at its maximum tolerable dose (MTD) (10 mg/kg/day, i.p. x1) in Calu-6 tumor-bearing athymic mice. The percent treated/control (%T/C) tumor volume ratios on day 38 were 35, 37, and 6, and the percent tumorgrowth delay (%TGD) values were 71, 65, and 188 for cisplatin, ABT-751 and the combination groups, respectively. HT-29 colon tumors were used to test ABT-751 in combination with an MTD of 5-FU, 30 mg/kg/day, i.p., q.d. x5. The %T/C ratios on day 38 were 22, 28, and 5 and the %TGD values were 75, 75, and 150 for 5-FU, ABT-751, and the combination groups, respectively. Treatment of HCT-116 colon carcinoma tumors with ABT-751, concurrent with the radiation treatment, was able to both enhance radiation-induced tumor regression, and delay the time to recurrence and progression. Growth curves allowed calculation of enhancement of radiation-induced growth delay (defined as the additional time required for a treated tumor to reach four times its original size) of 2, 9, and 12 days, for ABT-751 alone, radiation alone, and the combination, respectively. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these studies demonstrate that ABT-751 enhanced efficacy of standard cytotoxic therapies in a variety of tumor xenograft models, and that enhancement was at least additive in all systems.
Authors: Brian J Wilson; Tobias Schatton; Qian Zhan; Martin Gasser; Jie Ma; Karim R Saab; Robin Schanche; Ana-Maria Waaga-Gasser; Jason S Gold; Qin Huang; George F Murphy; Markus H Frank; Natasha Y Frank Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tian Ma; Alexander D Fuld; James R Rigas; Anne E Hagey; Gary B Gordon; Ethan Dmitrovsky; Konstantin H Dragnev Journal: Chemotherapy Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 2.544
Authors: Christopher L Morton; Edward G Favours; Kimberly S Mercer; Claire R Boltz; Jeri Carol Crumpton; Chandra Tucker; Catherine A Billups; Peter J Houghton Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2007-03-24 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Charles M Rudin; Ann Mauer; Martin Smakal; Rosalyn Juergens; Stanislav Spelda; Michael Wertheim; Andrew Coates; Evelyn McKeegan; Peter Ansell; Xiangdong Zhou; Jane Qian; Rajendra Pradhan; Barry Dowell; Andrew Krivoshik; Gary Gordon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Takashi Shingu; Lindsay Holmes; Verlene Henry; Qianghu Wang; Khatri Latha; Anupama E Gururaj; Laura A Gibson; Tiffany Doucette; Frederick F Lang; Ganesh Rao; Liang Yuan; Erik P Sulman; Nicholas P Farrell; Waldemar Priebe; Kenneth R Hess; Yaoqi A Wang; Jian Hu; Oliver Bögler Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Michelle A Rudek; Arvind Dasari; Daniel Laheru; Ping He; Runyan Jin; Rosalind Walker; Gretchen E Taylor; Antonio Jimeno; Ross C Donehower; Manuel Hidalgo; Wells A Messersmith; W Thomas Purcell Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 3.126