Literature DB >> 16967299

Chemosensitization and radiosensitization of human lung and colon cancers by antimitotic agent, ABT-751, in athymic murine xenograft models of subcutaneous tumor growth.

Timothy J Jorgensen1, Hui Tian, Ingrid B J K Joseph, Krishna Menon, David Frost.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: ABT-751 is an orally active antimitotic agent that is currently in Phase II clinical trials. This agent binds to the colchicine site on ss-tubulin and inhibits polymerization of microtubules. This disruption of microtubule dynamics leads to a block in the cell cycle at the G2/M phase, and promotes apoptosis. ABT-751, as a single agent, has antitumor activity against a series of xenograft models including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer. The current studies were conducted to determine whether ABT-751 enhances antitumor activity of standard cytotoxic therapies currently in clinical use.
METHODS: Efficacy of ABT-751, in combination with cisplatin, 5-FU, and radiation, was evaluated in the Calu-6 NSCLC, HT-29 colon, and HCT-116 colon carcinoma xenograft models, respectively. Tumor-bearing athymic mice were treated with ABT-751 orally once a day at 75 or 100 mg/kg/day on a 5-days-on, 5-days-off schedule for two cycles.
RESULTS: Efficacy of ABT-751 at 100 mg/kg/day was tested in combination with cisplatin at its maximum tolerable dose (MTD) (10 mg/kg/day, i.p. x1) in Calu-6 tumor-bearing athymic mice. The percent treated/control (%T/C) tumor volume ratios on day 38 were 35, 37, and 6, and the percent tumor growth delay (%TGD) values were 71, 65, and 188 for cisplatin, ABT-751 and the combination groups, respectively. HT-29 colon tumors were used to test ABT-751 in combination with an MTD of 5-FU, 30 mg/kg/day, i.p., q.d. x5. The %T/C ratios on day 38 were 22, 28, and 5 and the %TGD values were 75, 75, and 150 for 5-FU, ABT-751, and the combination groups, respectively. Treatment of HCT-116 colon carcinoma tumors with ABT-751, concurrent with the radiation treatment, was able to both enhance radiation-induced tumor regression, and delay the time to recurrence and progression. Growth curves allowed calculation of enhancement of radiation-induced growth delay (defined as the additional time required for a treated tumor to reach four times its original size) of 2, 9, and 12 days, for ABT-751 alone, radiation alone, and the combination, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Collectively, these studies demonstrate that ABT-751 enhanced efficacy of standard cytotoxic therapies in a variety of tumor xenograft models, and that enhancement was at least additive in all systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16967299     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-006-0326-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  13 in total

1.  ABCB5 identifies a therapy-refractory tumor cell population in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Brian J Wilson; Tobias Schatton; Qian Zhan; Martin Gasser; Jie Ma; Karim R Saab; Robin Schanche; Ana-Maria Waaga-Gasser; Jason S Gold; Qin Huang; George F Murphy; Markus H Frank; Natasha Y Frank
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  The unique characteristics of tumor vasculature and preclinical evidence for its selective disruption by Tumor-Vascular Disrupting Agents.

Authors:  Dietmar W Siemann
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  A phase I trial and in vitro studies combining ABT-751 with carboplatin in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Tian Ma; Alexander D Fuld; James R Rigas; Anne E Hagey; Gary B Gordon; Ethan Dmitrovsky; Konstantin H Dragnev
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.544

4.  Evaluation of ABT-751 against childhood cancer models in vivo.

Authors:  Christopher L Morton; Edward G Favours; Kimberly S Mercer; Claire R Boltz; Jeri Carol Crumpton; Chandra Tucker; Catherine A Billups; Peter J Houghton
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Phase I/II study of pemetrexed with or without ABT-751 in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Charles M Rudin; Ann Mauer; Martin Smakal; Rosalyn Juergens; Stanislav Spelda; Michael Wertheim; Andrew Coates; Evelyn McKeegan; Peter Ansell; Xiangdong Zhou; Jane Qian; Rajendra Pradhan; Barry Dowell; Andrew Krivoshik; Gary Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  SuFEx Click Chemistry Enabled Late-Stage Drug Functionalization.

Authors:  Zilei Liu; Jie Li; Suhua Li; Gencheng Li; K Barry Sharpless; Peng Wu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Microtubule dynamics as a target in oncology.

Authors:  April L Risinger; Francis J Giles; Susan L Mooberry
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Suppression of RAF/MEK or PI3K synergizes cytotoxicity of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in glioma tumor-initiating cells.

Authors:  Takashi Shingu; Lindsay Holmes; Verlene Henry; Qianghu Wang; Khatri Latha; Anupama E Gururaj; Laura A Gibson; Tiffany Doucette; Frederick F Lang; Ganesh Rao; Liang Yuan; Erik P Sulman; Nicholas P Farrell; Waldemar Priebe; Kenneth R Hess; Yaoqi A Wang; Jian Hu; Oliver Bögler
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Phase 1 Study of ABT-751 in Combination With CAPIRI (Capecitabine and Irinotecan) and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Michelle A Rudek; Arvind Dasari; Daniel Laheru; Ping He; Runyan Jin; Rosalind Walker; Gretchen E Taylor; Antonio Jimeno; Ross C Donehower; Manuel Hidalgo; Wells A Messersmith; W Thomas Purcell
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 10.  Tumor resistance to vascular disrupting agents: mechanisms, imaging, and solutions.

Authors:  Wenjie Liang; Yicheng Ni; Feng Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.