BACKGROUND: A pull-back tube esophagogram (PBTE) is widely accepted in the literature as the radiological investigation of choice for the diagnosis of tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. However, PBTE is rarely performed in our institution, as we have been successful in confirming the presence of such fistulae with a contrast material swallow (CS). We hypothesized that PBTE is not the radiological investigation of choice for the diagnosis of the fistula in this condition. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine what proportion of patients with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia can be diagnosed promptly by a CS and what the indications are for a PBTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological findings in patients with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia to determine whether the fistula was diagnosed with a CS or PBTE. RESULTS: We identified 20 children (13 female and 7 male) with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. Their age at diagnosis ranged from 3 days to 168 months with a median of 9 days. The diagnosis was documented by CS in 12, PBTE in 7 and CT in 1. In three of the seven who had the fistula documented by PBTE, a previous CS had shown contrast material in the trachea, but no fistulous tract or aspiration was identified. CONCLUSION: We believe that CS should be the examination of choice in most patients suspected of having a tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. A PBTE is indicated in patients who are intubated or are at significant risk of aspiration. Furthermore, a PBTE is also indicated where contrast material is seen in the airway on CS and there is uncertainty whether this is due to aspiration or a fistula.
BACKGROUND: A pull-back tube esophagogram (PBTE) is widely accepted in the literature as the radiological investigation of choice for the diagnosis of tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. However, PBTE is rarely performed in our institution, as we have been successful in confirming the presence of such fistulae with a contrast material swallow (CS). We hypothesized that PBTE is not the radiological investigation of choice for the diagnosis of the fistula in this condition. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine what proportion of patients with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia can be diagnosed promptly by a CS and what the indications are for a PBTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological findings in patients with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia to determine whether the fistula was diagnosed with a CS or PBTE. RESULTS: We identified 20 children (13 female and 7 male) with tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. Their age at diagnosis ranged from 3 days to 168 months with a median of 9 days. The diagnosis was documented by CS in 12, PBTE in 7 and CT in 1. In three of the seven who had the fistula documented by PBTE, a previous CS had shown contrast material in the trachea, but no fistulous tract or aspiration was identified. CONCLUSION: We believe that CS should be the examination of choice in most patients suspected of having a tracheoesophageal fistula without esophageal atresia. A PBTE is indicated in patients who are intubated or are at significant risk of aspiration. Furthermore, a PBTE is also indicated where contrast material is seen in the airway on CS and there is uncertainty whether this is due to aspiration or a fistula.
Authors: Augusto Zani; Luai Jamal; Giovanni Cobellis; Justyna M Wolinska; Samuel Fung; Evan J Propst; Priscilla P L Chiu; Agostino Pierro Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Pia S Kaminen; Sanna J Viitanen; Anu K Lappalainen; Anja Kipar; Minna M Rajamäki; Outi M Laitinen-Vapaavuori Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 2.741